GangToken is a standard ERC-20 token with additional administrative functions allowing a 'launchpad' address to manage liquidity pairs and perform token transfers on behalf of users. The architecture relies on centralized control for critical operations, which introduces significant trust requirements. 7.1 Architecture: Centralized. 7.2 Code Security: Standard. 7.3 Access Control: Restricted. 7.4 Economic: High risk due to minting/pulling capabilities. 7.5 Governance: Centralized. 7.6 External: Standard. 7.7 Upgrades: N/A. 7.8 Operations: High dependency on launchpad.

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is 第一个回购销毁模式 a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →GangToken is a standard ERC-20 token with additional administrative functions allowing a 'launchpad' address to manage liquidity pairs and perform token transfers on behalf of users.
Read the full analysis- Owner can change any holder's balance
- Hidden owner — control survives an apparent renounce; held by launchpad: Multisig
- Owner can pause all transfers; held by launchpad: Multisig
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded; held by launchpad: Multisig
- Ownership status UNKNOWN
- Liquidity not locked
- Liquidity < $50k
- Volume/Liquidity > 15×
- Top-10 concentration > 20%
Exact factors
- Owner can change any holder's balance (seize or credit tokens); held by launchpad: Multisig
- Hidden owner — control survives an apparent renounce; held by launchpad: Multisig
- Owner can pause all transfers; held by launchpad: Multisig
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded; held by launchpad: Multisig
- Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
- Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool) — who holds it cannot be verified
- Liquidity < $50k ($11,926 across 1 pairs — thin market)
- Volume/Liquidity > 15× (43.2× — wash-trading signal)
- Top-10 concentration > 20% (50.1% total → 20.9% effective; 6.9% in EOAs, 35.0% in contracts; 8.2% burned, locked or in pools excluded)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 29Holders
as of audit · Oct 29, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking35.0%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell6.9%
- Burnedout of circulation8.2%
- Everyone else504 holders49.9%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 29, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 29The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.
0x0eb6…5e43Security Findings
MediumCentralized Control Over Token Balances
The 'launchpad' address has the authority to call reclaim and pullFor functions, which can move tokens from user wallets to the launchpad address. This centralized control allows the administrator to unilaterally affect user balances and potentially drain liquidity.CP-01
Issue
The 'launchpad' address has the authority to call reclaim and pullFor functions, which can move tokens from user wallets to the launchpad address. This centralized control allows the administrator to unilaterally affect user balances and potentially drain liquidity.
Fix
Restrict the scope of the launchpad's authority or implement a decentralized governance mechanism to oversee these privileged actions. Ensure that the launchpad address is secured by a multi-signature wallet.
Status
Unresolved
MediumLiquidity not locked
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0x0eb6…5e43 — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY
Issue
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0x0eb6…5e43 — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
Fix
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 50.1% of supply. Of that, 8.2% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 6.9% in wallets, 35.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 1.0%. 514 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 50.1% of supply. Of that, 8.2% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 6.9% in wallets, 35.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 1.0%. 514 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
514 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
514 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $12K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $515K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $12K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $515K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $12K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $12K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 29The contract implements standard ERC-20 functionality with clean logic for transfers and allowances. The use of OpenZeppelin-style patterns ensures compatibility with standard wallets and DEXs. However, the reliance on a single 'launchpad' address for critical state changes creates a single point of failure. The code is well-structured and follows modern Solidity practices.
The economic model is heavily centralized, granting the launchpad address the ability to move user funds and modify pair settings. This creates a trust-based environment where holders are vulnerable to administrative actions. The reclaim and pullFor functions allow for significant manipulation of token balances and supply dynamics. Transparency regarding the launchpad's identity is essential for users.
The contract is not upgradeable and does not utilize proxy patterns. Logic is immutable once deployed, providing certainty to users regarding the contract's behavior. No upgrade-related risks are present.
We recommend transitioning the 'launchpad' role to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract to mitigate the risk of a single compromised key.
Additionally, consider implementing a timelock for sensitive administrative functions like setPair to provide users with notice before changes to the token's economic rules take effect.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 29, 202665High
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the GANGBALL contract address?
The 第一个回购销毁模式 (GANGBALL) contract on BNB Chain is 0xb1f21c4509aebd494ee58c80da3e07d979d499a3. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Is 第一个回购销毁模式 a scam?
Quantum Audit's risk score for 第一个回购销毁模式 is 65/100 (High risk) as of Oct 29, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Mint: Mintable; Liquidity lock: Not locked; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Is GANGBALL liquidity locked?
Liquidity lock: Not locked (as of Oct 29, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $11.9K.
Who holds GANGBALL?
As of Oct 29, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 50.1% of the supply across 514 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of 第一个回购销毁模式?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified