Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

On-chain security analysis — is it a scam or legit?

Is Flying Tesla Roadster Safe?

FTRBNB Chain
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Oct 23, 2026 · 1 audit on record
SummaryAI Copilot

The FlapTaxTokenV3 is an EIP-1167 minimal clone implementation of an ERC-20 token with custom tax and migration logic.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Liquidity not locked
Exact factors
  • Liquidity NOT locked (82% of the pool) — who holds it cannot be verified

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Security Checklist

as of audit · Oct 235 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipRenounced
MintNo mint
Liquidity lockNot locked
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax3% / 3%

Holders

as of audit · Oct 23, 202611,901 holders
7.0%DEX pools91.2%Everyone else
7.0%91.2%Everyone else
ContractsWalletsBurnedLockedDEX poolsEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply
8.8%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking0.5%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell1.0%
  • Burnedout of circulation0.2%
  • Lockedtime-locked0.2%
  • DEX poolsthe pools' own liquidity7.0%
  • Everyone else11,891 holders91.2%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads1.2%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 23, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Oct 23$1.76M

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensNot locked

The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.

Analysed pool$1.76MShare of depth100.0%
LP Burned18.4%
LP Locked18.4% · Null Address
Top-1 Unlocked Holder81.6%
Top-3 Unlocked81.6%
Unlocked LP held by
0xbd4e…89b1

Security Findings

1 Medium6 Info
Medium

Liquidity not locked

18.4% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 18.4% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. 81.6% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0xbd4e…89b1 — holds 81.6% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY

Issue

18.4% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 18.4% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. 81.6% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0xbd4e…89b1 — holds 81.6% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.

Fix

Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

No issues identified in the reviewed source

The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint/owner authority, mint capability, LP lock/burn state, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.I-01

Issue

The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint/owner authority, mint capability, LP lock/burn state, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.

Fix

Re-check after any contract upgrade or ownership change, both of which can alter behaviour without changing this page.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 8.8% of supply. Of that, 0.2% burned, 0.2% locked, 7.0% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 1.0% in wallets, 0.5% in other contracts. 11,901 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 8.8% of supply. Of that, 0.2% burned, 0.2% locked, 7.0% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 1.0% in wallets, 0.5% in other contracts. 11,901 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

11,901 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

11,901 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $1.8M (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $389K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $1.8M (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $389K (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: nobody (ownership renounced). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: 3% on buy, 3% on sell. Market: $1.8M of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: 7 days of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: nobody (ownership renounced). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: 3% on buy, 3% on sell. Market: $1.8M of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: 7 days of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — 7 days of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is 7 days old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

The token's oldest DEX pool is 7 days old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 23
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The FlapTaxTokenV3 is an EIP-1167 minimal clone implementation of an ERC-20 token with custom tax and migration logic. The contract ownership has been renounced on-chain, effectively disabling all administrative functions, including migration controls. The architecture is immutable, and the code adheres to standard OpenZeppelin upgradeable patterns, though the renounced ownership renders the upgradeable features dormant.

Technical10/10Low risk

The contract utilizes a robust EIP-1167 minimal clone pattern, ensuring consistent logic deployment. 7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security are sound, leveraging well-audited OpenZeppelin libraries. 7.3 Access Control is strictly defined, though currently rendered inert by the renounced ownership. 7.6 External dependencies are limited to standard ERC-20 interfaces, minimizing integration risks.

Governance2/10High risk

7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance parameters are locked due to the renounced ownership. The migration mechanism, intended to shift pool states, is no longer accessible, preventing any further administrative manipulation of tax or anti-farmer logic. This provides high certainty for token holders regarding the immutability of the current economic model.

Upgrades8/10Low risk

7.7 Upgrades are effectively disabled for this instance. While the contract inherits from Initializable and uses upgradeable base contracts, the EIP-1167 clone pattern fixes the implementation address permanently. 7.8 Operations are stable, as no further administrative changes can be performed on the contract state.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

The protocol is currently in a state of permanent immutability due to the renounced ownership.

No further security actions are required regarding administrative functions as they are effectively disabled. Users should be aware that the current tax and migration state is final and cannot be adjusted by any party.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeFlapTaxTokenV3
NetworkBNB Chain
Token age7d
Contract0x66e0…7777
Deployer0x2738…b52a
Badge for your website
Flying Tesla Roadster security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Oct 23, 202618Low

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the FTR contract address?

The Flying Tesla Roadster (FTR) contract on BNB Chain is 0x66e0bf5ea20ca8386ac370026ca7a4db32417777. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.

Is Flying Tesla Roadster a scam?

Quantum Audit's risk score for Flying Tesla Roadster is 18/100 (Low risk) as of Oct 23, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Renounced; Mint: No mint; Liquidity lock: Not locked; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 3% / 3%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.

Is FTR liquidity locked?

Liquidity lock: Not locked (as of Oct 23, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $1.76M.

Who holds FTR?

As of Oct 23, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 8.8% of the supply across 11,901 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Flying Tesla Roadster?

Our AI-powered scanner gives you a deeper, real-time smart contract analysis — free, with every scoring factor shown.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page