The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with additional governance and vesting capabilities. The protocol relies on a centralized owner to manage inflation and liquidity pool access. While the code follows standard OpenZeppelin patterns, the high degree of administrative control over token supply and transferability introduces significant trust requirements for token holders.
Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is Federal Oil Trust Fund a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with additional governance and vesting capabilities.
Read the full analysis- Owner can pause all transfers
- A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
- LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
- Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
- Owner can pause all transfers
- A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
- LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
- Top-10 concentration > 30% (100.0% total → 48.2% effective; 16.2% in EOAs, 80.0% in contracts; 3.8% burned, locked or in pools excluded)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 28Holders
as of audit · Oct 28, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking80.0%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell16.2%
- Burnedout of circulation3.8%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 28, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 28The risk score reads depth across every pair.
Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.
Security Findings
MediumCentralized Control Over Token Supply
The owner has the authority to call updateMintRate and release functions, which can increase the total supply of the token. This allows the owner to dilute the holdings of all existing token holders at their discretion.CP-01
Issue
The owner has the authority to call updateMintRate and release functions, which can increase the total supply of the token. This allows the owner to dilute the holdings of all existing token holders at their discretion.
Fix
Implement a timelock for these functions or move the ownership to a decentralized governance contract to prevent unilateral supply changes.
Status
Unresolved
MediumCentralized Control Over Transferability
The owner can toggle the isPoolUnlocked switch via lockPool and unlockPool functions. This allows the owner to unilaterally halt or enable token transfers, effectively freezing user funds or restricting market activity.CP-05
Issue
The owner can toggle the isPoolUnlocked switch via lockPool and unlockPool functions. This allows the owner to unilaterally halt or enable token transfers, effectively freezing user funds or restricting market activity.
Fix
Remove the ability to arbitrarily lock transfers or implement a community-driven voting mechanism to trigger such emergency stops.
Status
Unresolved
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 489 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 489 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
489 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
489 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $191K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $207K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $191K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $207K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $191K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $191K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 28The architecture utilizes standard OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20, Votes, and Permit functionality, ensuring robust base implementation. 7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security are well-structured, leveraging battle-tested components. However, 7.3 Access Control is highly centralized, granting the owner significant power over supply and transfer logic. 7.6 External dependencies are minimal and standard.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance aspects are heavily reliant on the owner's discretion. The ability to mint tokens via updateMintRate and release functions allows for potential supply dilution. 7.8 Operations are centralized, meaning the protocol's economic stability is tied directly to the owner's wallet security.
7.7 Upgrades are not applicable as the contract is not a proxy. The logic is immutable, though administrative parameters remain adjustable. This provides a stable environment but lacks the flexibility of upgradeable patterns.
To improve security, consider transitioning ownership to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized DAO governance contract to mitigate the risk of a single point of failure.
Additionally, implementing a timelock on sensitive functions like updateMintRate would provide transparency and allow the community to react to significant changes in tokenomics. Ensure that the private keys associated with the owner address are stored in a secure, hardware-backed environment. Regularly audit the state of the pool and minting parameters to ensure they align with the stated economic model.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 28, 202656Medium
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the FOTF contract address?
The Federal Oil Trust Fund (FOTF) contract on Base is 0x9654e5feb040c82a937730e947cfcf2c43c8474f. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Is Federal Oil Trust Fund a scam?
Quantum Audit's risk score for Federal Oil Trust Fund is 56/100 (Medium risk) as of Oct 28, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Retained; Mint: Mintable; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Who holds FOTF?
As of Oct 28, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 100.0% of the supply across 489 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Federal Oil Trust Fund?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified