Is febu Safe? Smart Contract Security Analysis

Security Findings

1 Info

Info

No code-level findings — an SPL mint exposes no auditable program source

I-01This token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

IssueThis token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

FixRead the risk score breakdown below as the substance of this audit. For a code-level review, the token would need an accompanying verified program.

StatusAcknowledged

Category Ratings

TechnicalMedium6/10

The febu token is implemented using the spl-token-2022 program, indicating modern SPL features. Both the Mint Authority and Freeze Authority have been revoked, preventing further token issuance or freezing of holder accounts. No Transfer Hook is active, and new accounts are not created in a frozen state. Furthermore, external security signals confirm that balance mutability, account closability, and transfer fee/hook upgradability are all disabled, enhancing security.

GovernanceHigh2/10

DEX liquidity for febu stands at $139,383, which is sufficient to avoid very low liquidity concerns. The 24-hour volume of $608,636 results in a Volume/Liquidity Ratio of 4.37, indicating normal trading activity without signs of wash trading. The DEX pair has been active for 14 days, providing a short but established track record. However, chain-native RPC data for holder concentration was unavailable, preventing a full assessment of supply distribution risk.

UpgradesMedium5/10

The token's configuration shows a strong commitment to immutability, as both the Mint Authority and Freeze Authority are permanently revoked. This prevents any future changes to the total supply or the ability to freeze accounts. Key Token-2022 extensions like Transfer Hook and Default Account State Frozen are not enabled, and metadata is immutable, ensuring branding and core token behavior cannot be altered post-launch. There is no permanent delegate configured, further limiting external control.

Security Checklist

1/4 checks passed

Contract VerifiedFail

No Mint Function?

Liquidity LockedFail

Not a ProxyPass

Liquidity Depth

$83.2K across 8 pairs

PumpswapSOLanalysed$66.8K Raydium CLMMCASH$11.4K Meteora DLMMSOL$4.8K Meteora DYN2Circuit$171 Meteora DYN2CSR$8 Meteora DYN2USDC$6

Show 2 more pairsShow less

Meteora DYN2USD2$4 Meteora DYN2RevEng$4

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

What Raised This Score

6 factors

Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
Contract source NOT verified
Top-10 concentration > 30% (41.5% total → 41.5% effective; 41.5% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts — moderate)
Liquidity NOT locked (owner can withdraw — rug-pull risk)
Token age < 30 days (still settling)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Is febu Safe?