The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with additional governance and vesting capabilities. The protocol relies on a centralized owner to manage inflation rates and pool access. While the code follows standard OpenZeppelin patterns, the high level of administrative control over token supply and transferability presents a significant centralization risk.
Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is DOTF a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with additional governance and vesting capabilities.
Read the full analysis- Owner can pause all transfers
- A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
- LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
- Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
- Owner can pause all transfers
- A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
- LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
- Top-10 concentration > 30% (100.0% total → 48.2% effective; 16.2% in EOAs, 80.0% in contracts; 3.8% burned, locked or in pools excluded)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 24Holders
as of audit · Oct 24, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking80.0%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell16.2%
- Burnedout of circulation3.8%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 24, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 24The risk score reads depth across every pair.
Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.
Security Findings
MediumCentralized Control Over Token Supply
The owner has the authority to call updateMintRate and release, which can increase the total supply of the token. This allows the owner to dilute existing holders at their discretion within the defined 2% annual limit.CP-01
Issue
The owner has the authority to call updateMintRate and release, which can increase the total supply of the token. This allows the owner to dilute existing holders at their discretion within the defined 2% annual limit.
Fix
Implement a timelock for all supply-altering functions to provide transparency and prevent sudden, unexpected inflation events.
Status
Unresolved
MediumCentralized Control Over Transferability
The owner can use lockPool and unlockPool to enable or disable token transfers. This creates a risk where the owner can effectively freeze user funds or restrict liquidity at any time.CP-05
Issue
The owner can use lockPool and unlockPool to enable or disable token transfers. This creates a risk where the owner can effectively freeze user funds or restrict liquidity at any time.
Fix
Restrict the use of transfer-blocking functions to emergency scenarios only, and document the specific criteria under which these functions would be invoked.
Status
Unresolved
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 2,012 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 2,012 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
2,012 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
2,012 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $78K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $173K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $78K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $173K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $78K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $78K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 24The architecture leverages well-tested OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20 and governance. 7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security are robust, utilizing standard inheritance patterns. However, 7.3 Access Control is highly centralized, granting the owner significant power over core token mechanics. 7.8 Operations are straightforward, though the reliance on block.timestamp for inflation calculations is standard but requires monitoring.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance aspects are heavily centralized under the contract owner. The owner can unilaterally mint tokens up to a 2% annual cap and toggle transferability, which directly impacts token value and liquidity. These mechanisms allow for rapid changes to the economic model without community oversight.
7.7 Upgrades are not supported as the contract is not a proxy. This ensures immutability of the logic, which is a strength for security. No upgrade-related risks are present.
To improve security and decentralization, consider transitioning ownership to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance DAO.
Implementing a timelock on sensitive functions like updateMintRate would provide transparency and allow the community to react to significant economic changes before they take effect. Ensure that the owner address is secured with robust multi-factor authentication or hardware security modules. Regularly audit the state of the pool and inflation parameters to ensure they remain within expected bounds and align with the project's long-term economic roadmap.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 24, 202657Medium
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the DOTF contract address?
The DOTF contract on Base is 0xd97c0154c17ace62b88b4efa908ddb6f943c1c93. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Is DOTF a scam?
Quantum Audit's risk score for DOTF is 57/100 (Medium risk) as of Oct 24, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Retained; Mint: Mintable; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Who holds DOTF?
As of Oct 24, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 100.0% of the supply across 2,012 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of DOTF?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page