Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is DOTF a Scam?

Base
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Oct 24, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 23h old
SummaryAI Copilot

The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with additional governance and vesting capabilities.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Owner can pause all transfers
  • A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
  • Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
  • Owner can pause all transfers
  • A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
  • Top-10 concentration > 30% (100.0% total → 48.2% effective; 16.2% in EOAs, 80.0% in contracts; 3.8% burned, locked or in pools excluded)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (23h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Oct 244 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipRetained
MintMintable
Liquidity lockUnknown
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Oct 24, 20262,012 holders
80.0%Contracts16.2%Wallets3.8%
80.0%Contracts16.2%Wallets3.8%
ContractsWalletsBurnedBubble area = share of supply
100.0%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking80.0%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell16.2%
  • Burnedout of circulation3.8%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads48.2%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 24, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Oct 24$78.5K

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensUnknown

Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.

Analysed pool$78.5KShare of depth100.0%

Security Findings

2 Medium5 Info
Medium

Centralized Control Over Token Supply

The owner has the authority to call updateMintRate and release, which can increase the total supply of the token. This allows the owner to dilute existing holders at their discretion within the defined 2% annual limit.CP-01

Issue

The owner has the authority to call updateMintRate and release, which can increase the total supply of the token. This allows the owner to dilute existing holders at their discretion within the defined 2% annual limit.

Fix

Implement a timelock for all supply-altering functions to provide transparency and prevent sudden, unexpected inflation events.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Centralized Control Over Transferability

The owner can use lockPool and unlockPool to enable or disable token transfers. This creates a risk where the owner can effectively freeze user funds or restrict liquidity at any time.CP-05

Issue

The owner can use lockPool and unlockPool to enable or disable token transfers. This creates a risk where the owner can effectively freeze user funds or restrict liquidity at any time.

Fix

Restrict the use of transfer-blocking functions to emergency scenarios only, and document the specific criteria under which these functions would be invoked.

Status

Unresolved

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 2,012 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 2,012 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

2,012 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

2,012 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $78K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $173K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $78K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $173K (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $78K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $78K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — less than a day of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 24
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with additional governance and vesting capabilities. The protocol relies on a centralized owner to manage inflation rates and pool access. While the code follows standard OpenZeppelin patterns, the high level of administrative control over token supply and transferability presents a significant centralization risk.

Technical8/10Low risk

The architecture leverages well-tested OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20 and governance. 7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security are robust, utilizing standard inheritance patterns. However, 7.3 Access Control is highly centralized, granting the owner significant power over core token mechanics. 7.8 Operations are straightforward, though the reliance on block.timestamp for inflation calculations is standard but requires monitoring.

Governance3/10High risk

7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance aspects are heavily centralized under the contract owner. The owner can unilaterally mint tokens up to a 2% annual cap and toggle transferability, which directly impacts token value and liquidity. These mechanisms allow for rapid changes to the economic model without community oversight.

Upgrades4/10Medium risk

7.7 Upgrades are not supported as the contract is not a proxy. This ensures immutability of the logic, which is a strength for security. No upgrade-related risks are present.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

To improve security and decentralization, consider transitioning ownership to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance DAO.

Implementing a timelock on sensitive functions like updateMintRate would provide transparency and allow the community to react to significant economic changes before they take effect. Ensure that the owner address is secured with robust multi-factor authentication or hardware security modules. Regularly audit the state of the pool and inflation parameters to ensure they remain within expected bounds and align with the project's long-term economic roadmap.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeToken
NetworkBase
Token age23h
Contract0xd97c…1c93
Deployer0xfd1b…b3f1
Badge for your website
DOTF security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Oct 24, 202657Medium

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the DOTF contract address?

The DOTF contract on Base is 0xd97c0154c17ace62b88b4efa908ddb6f943c1c93. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.

Is DOTF a scam?

Quantum Audit's risk score for DOTF is 57/100 (Medium risk) as of Oct 24, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Retained; Mint: Mintable; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.

Who holds DOTF?

As of Oct 24, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 100.0% of the supply across 2,012 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of DOTF?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page