Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is DOAS a Scam?

Base
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Oct 24, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 12h old
SummaryAI Copilot

The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with governance capabilities (ERC20Votes) and centralized administrative controls.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Owner can pause all transfers
  • A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
  • Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
  • Owner can pause all transfers
  • A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
  • Top-10 concentration > 30% (100.0% total → 48.2% effective; 16.2% in EOAs, 80.0% in contracts; 3.8% burned, locked or in pools excluded)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (12h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Oct 244 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipRetained
MintMintable
Liquidity lockUnknown
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Oct 24, 20262,830 holders
80.0%Contracts16.2%Wallets3.8%
80.0%Contracts16.2%
ContractsWalletsBurnedBubble area = share of supply
100.0%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking80.0%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell16.2%
  • Burnedout of circulation3.8%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads48.2%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 24, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Oct 24$101.0K

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensUnknown

Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.

Analysed pool$101.0KShare of depth100.0%

Security Findings

2 Medium5 Info
Medium

Centralized Control Over Token Supply

The owner has the authority to mint new tokens via the updateMintRate and release functions. This allows the owner to increase the total supply at their discretion, which can dilute the value of existing holdings.CP-01

Issue

The owner has the authority to mint new tokens via the updateMintRate and release functions. This allows the owner to increase the total supply at their discretion, which can dilute the value of existing holdings.

Fix

Transition ownership to a decentralized governance contract or implement a hard-coded, immutable inflation schedule that cannot be modified by any single address.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Centralized Control Over Transferability

The owner can toggle the isPoolUnlocked switch using the lockPool and unlockPool functions. This grants the owner the power to unilaterally halt or resume token transfers, effectively freezing user assets.CP-05

Issue

The owner can toggle the isPoolUnlocked switch using the lockPool and unlockPool functions. This grants the owner the power to unilaterally halt or resume token transfers, effectively freezing user assets.

Fix

Remove the ability to lock transfers or restrict this functionality to a decentralized voting process to prevent potential abuse of power.

Status

Unresolved

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 2,830 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 2,830 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

2,830 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

2,830 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $101K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $370K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $101K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $370K (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $101K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $101K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — less than a day of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 24
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with governance capabilities (ERC20Votes) and centralized administrative controls. The protocol relies on a single owner to manage inflation, pool locking, and vesting releases. While the code follows standard OpenZeppelin patterns, the high level of centralization poses a significant risk to token holders.

Technical8/10Low risk

The contract utilizes well-audited OpenZeppelin libraries for core ERC-20 and governance functionality. 7.1 Architecture is modular, and 7.2 Code Security is high due to the use of standard, battle-tested implementations. However, 7.3 Access Control is heavily centralized, granting the owner broad authority over token supply and transferability.

Governance3/10High risk

7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance aspects are dominated by the owner's ability to mint tokens and restrict transfers. While 7.6 External dependencies are minimal, the economic model is subject to administrative intervention. The lack of a decentralized governance mechanism for these critical functions is a notable weakness.

Upgrades4/10Medium risk

7.7 Upgrades are not applicable as the contract is not a proxy. 7.8 Operations are handled via direct owner calls. The immutability of the contract logic provides a baseline of security, though it prevents emergency patching if a bug were discovered.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

To improve security, the protocol should transition from a single-owner model to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract (e.g., Governor Bravo/Compound).

This would mitigate the risk of a single point of failure regarding token minting and transfer restrictions. Additionally, consider implementing a timelock for all administrative functions. A delay of 24-48 hours on functions like updateMintRate or lockPool would provide transparency to the community and allow users to react to significant changes in tokenomics.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeToken
NetworkBase
Token age12h
Contract0x935a…fb4e
Deployer0xd657…b172
Badge for your website
DOAS security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Oct 24, 202657Medium

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the DOAS contract address?

The DOAS contract on Base is 0x935a7ec64a2a308aef2a9ac2464cba80f9d1fb4e. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.

Is DOAS a scam?

Quantum Audit's risk score for DOAS is 57/100 (Medium risk) as of Oct 24, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Retained; Mint: Mintable; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.

Who holds DOAS?

As of Oct 24, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 100.0% of the supply across 2,830 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of DOAS?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page