The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with governance capabilities (ERC20Votes) and centralized administrative controls. The protocol relies on a single owner to manage inflation, pool locking, and vesting releases. While the code follows standard OpenZeppelin patterns, the high level of centralization poses a significant risk to token holders.
Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is DOAS a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with governance capabilities (ERC20Votes) and centralized administrative controls.
Read the full analysis- Owner can pause all transfers
- A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
- LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
- Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
- Owner can pause all transfers
- A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
- LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
- Top-10 concentration > 30% (100.0% total → 48.2% effective; 16.2% in EOAs, 80.0% in contracts; 3.8% burned, locked or in pools excluded)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 24Holders
as of audit · Oct 24, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking80.0%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell16.2%
- Burnedout of circulation3.8%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 24, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 24The risk score reads depth across every pair.
Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.
Security Findings
MediumCentralized Control Over Token Supply
The owner has the authority to mint new tokens via the updateMintRate and release functions. This allows the owner to increase the total supply at their discretion, which can dilute the value of existing holdings.CP-01
Issue
The owner has the authority to mint new tokens via the updateMintRate and release functions. This allows the owner to increase the total supply at their discretion, which can dilute the value of existing holdings.
Fix
Transition ownership to a decentralized governance contract or implement a hard-coded, immutable inflation schedule that cannot be modified by any single address.
Status
Unresolved
MediumCentralized Control Over Transferability
The owner can toggle the isPoolUnlocked switch using the lockPool and unlockPool functions. This grants the owner the power to unilaterally halt or resume token transfers, effectively freezing user assets.CP-05
Issue
The owner can toggle the isPoolUnlocked switch using the lockPool and unlockPool functions. This grants the owner the power to unilaterally halt or resume token transfers, effectively freezing user assets.
Fix
Remove the ability to lock transfers or restrict this functionality to a decentralized voting process to prevent potential abuse of power.
Status
Unresolved
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 2,830 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 2,830 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
2,830 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
2,830 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $101K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $370K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $101K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $370K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $101K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $101K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 24The contract utilizes well-audited OpenZeppelin libraries for core ERC-20 and governance functionality. 7.1 Architecture is modular, and 7.2 Code Security is high due to the use of standard, battle-tested implementations. However, 7.3 Access Control is heavily centralized, granting the owner broad authority over token supply and transferability.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance aspects are dominated by the owner's ability to mint tokens and restrict transfers. While 7.6 External dependencies are minimal, the economic model is subject to administrative intervention. The lack of a decentralized governance mechanism for these critical functions is a notable weakness.
7.7 Upgrades are not applicable as the contract is not a proxy. 7.8 Operations are handled via direct owner calls. The immutability of the contract logic provides a baseline of security, though it prevents emergency patching if a bug were discovered.
To improve security, the protocol should transition from a single-owner model to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract (e.g., Governor Bravo/Compound).
This would mitigate the risk of a single point of failure regarding token minting and transfer restrictions. Additionally, consider implementing a timelock for all administrative functions. A delay of 24-48 hours on functions like updateMintRate or lockPool would provide transparency to the community and allow users to react to significant changes in tokenomics.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 24, 202657Medium
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the DOAS contract address?
The DOAS contract on Base is 0x935a7ec64a2a308aef2a9ac2464cba80f9d1fb4e. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Is DOAS a scam?
Quantum Audit's risk score for DOAS is 57/100 (Medium risk) as of Oct 24, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Retained; Mint: Mintable; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Who holds DOAS?
As of Oct 24, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 100.0% of the supply across 2,830 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of DOAS?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page