Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with additional governance and vesting features.
Read the full analysisEach factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 21, 2026
The risk score reads depth across every pair.
Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.
The owner can call updateMintRate and release to increase the total token supply. This allows the owner to dilute the value of existing holdings at their discretion, provided they stay within the 2% annual limit.
Implement a timelock on minting functions or transition ownership to a DAO to ensure community oversight of supply changes.
Unresolved
The owner can use lockPool and unlockPool to enable or disable transfers for specific pools. This grants the owner the ability to effectively freeze user assets or prevent trading at any time.
Remove the ability to arbitrarily lock transfers or restrict this functionality to a decentralized governance vote.
Unresolved
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.7% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.1% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 2,078 holders in total.
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Acknowledged
2,078 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Acknowledged
Liquidity $51K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $111K (DexScreener, all pools).
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Acknowledged
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $51K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Acknowledged
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Acknowledged
The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with additional governance and vesting features. The architecture relies on a centralized owner to manage minting rates and pool transfer restrictions. While the code follows standard OpenZeppelin patterns, the high level of administrative control over supply and transferability introduces significant centralization risk.
The contract utilizes well-tested OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20, Votes, and Permitting. 7.1 Architecture is modular, and 7.2 Code Security is high due to the use of standard, audited base contracts. 7.3 Access Control is strictly enforced via the Ownable pattern, though this creates a single point of failure. 7.6 External dependencies are limited to standard interfaces, reducing integration risks.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance aspects are heavily centralized. The owner has the ability to mint tokens up to a 2% annual limit and toggle transferability via lockPool. This allows the owner to unilaterally alter tokenomics and restrict liquidity, which is a significant risk for token holders.
7.7 Upgrades are not supported as the contract is not a proxy. 7.8 Operations are straightforward, relying on the owner to trigger vesting releases and inflation adjustments. No complex upgrade path exists to introduce hidden logic changes.
To improve security and trust, consider transitioning the ownership to a decentralized governance model, such as a multi-signature wallet or a DAO contract.
This would mitigate the risks associated with a single privileged address having the power to mint tokens and freeze transfers. Additionally, implement a timelock controller for all privileged functions. This would provide transparency to the community and ensure that any changes to the token's economic parameters or transfer rules are subject to a mandatory delay, allowing users to react to administrative actions.
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page
