Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is Digital Oil Trust Fund🔥 a Scam?

DOTFBase
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Oct 25, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 12h old
SummaryAI Copilot

The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with additional governance and vesting capabilities.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Owner can pause all transfers
  • A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
  • Liquidity < $50k
  • Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
  • Owner can pause all transfers
  • A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
  • Liquidity < $50k ($47,810 across 1 pairs — thin market)
  • Top-10 concentration > 30% (100.0% total → 48.2% effective; 16.2% in EOAs, 80.1% in contracts; 3.7% burned, locked or in pools excluded)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (12h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Oct 254 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipRetained
MintMintable
Liquidity lockUnknown
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Oct 25, 20262,313 holders
80.1%Contracts16.2%Wallets3.7%
80.1%Contracts16.2%Wallets3.7%
ContractsWalletsBurnedBubble area = share of supply
100.0%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking80.1%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell16.2%
  • Burnedout of circulation3.7%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads48.2%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 25, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Oct 25$47.8K

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensUnknown

Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.

Analysed pool$47.8KShare of depth100.0%

Security Findings

2 Medium5 Info
Medium

Centralized Minting Authority

The owner has the ability to increase the total supply of the token through the updateMintRate and release functions. This allows for the dilution of existing token holders' value at the discretion of the owner.CP-01

Issue

The owner has the ability to increase the total supply of the token through the updateMintRate and release functions. This allows for the dilution of existing token holders' value at the discretion of the owner.

Fix

Implement a timelock for minting operations or transition ownership to a decentralized governance structure to prevent arbitrary supply increases.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Centralized Transfer Control

The owner can use the lockPool and unlockPool functions to toggle a switch that determines whether transfers are allowed. This gives the owner the power to freeze user assets or halt trading at any time.CP-05

Issue

The owner can use the lockPool and unlockPool functions to toggle a switch that determines whether transfers are allowed. This gives the owner the power to freeze user assets or halt trading at any time.

Fix

Remove the ability to arbitrarily lock transfers or document the specific conditions under which this feature will be used to ensure transparency for users.

Status

Unresolved

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.7% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.1% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 2,313 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.7% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.1% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 2,313 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

2,313 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

2,313 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $48K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $90K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $48K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $90K (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $48K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $48K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — less than a day of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 25
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with additional governance and vesting capabilities. The protocol relies on a centralized owner to manage inflation, pool locking, and vesting releases. While the code follows standard OpenZeppelin patterns, the high degree of administrative control poses a significant centralization risk to token holders.

Technical8/10Low risk

The contract utilizes well-audited OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20, Permitting, and Governance functionality. 7.1 Architecture is modular, and 7.2 Code Security is robust due to the use of standard, battle-tested implementations. 7.3 Access Control is strictly enforced via the Ownable pattern, though this creates a single point of failure. 7.6 External dependencies are minimal and standard for the ecosystem.

Governance2/10High risk

7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance aspects are heavily centralized under the contract owner. The owner has the ability to mint new tokens up to a 2% annual cap and can unilaterally halt transfers via the pool locking mechanism. This creates a trust-based environment where holders must rely on the owner's integrity for economic stability.

Upgrades4/10Medium risk

7.7 Upgrades are not supported as the contract is not a proxy. 7.8 Operations are limited to the owner's defined functions. The lack of upgradeability ensures immutability of the core logic, which is a positive security trait.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

To improve security, consider transitioning the ownership to a decentralized multi-signature wallet or a DAO governance contract to mitigate the risks associated with a single administrative point of failure.

Additionally, implementing a timelock on sensitive functions like updateMintRate would provide transparency and allow the community to react to significant economic changes.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeToken
NetworkBase
Token age12h
Contract0x1c30…177f
Deployer0x1be1…12c8
Badge for your website
Digital Oil Trust Fund🔥 security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Oct 25, 202664Medium

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the DOTF contract address?

The Digital Oil Trust Fund🔥 (DOTF) contract on Base is 0x1c30961f107e9330c6b697e86044ccb2a641177f. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.

Is Digital Oil Trust Fund🔥 a scam?

Quantum Audit's risk score for Digital Oil Trust Fund🔥 is 64/100 (Medium risk) as of Oct 25, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Retained; Mint: Mintable; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.

Who holds DOTF?

As of Oct 25, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 100.0% of the supply across 2,313 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Digital Oil Trust Fund🔥?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page