The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with additional governance and vesting capabilities. The protocol relies on a centralized owner to manage inflation, pool locking, and vesting releases. While the code follows standard OpenZeppelin patterns, the high degree of administrative control poses a significant centralization risk to token holders.
Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is Digital Oil Trust Fund🔥 a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with additional governance and vesting capabilities.
Read the full analysis- Owner can pause all transfers
- A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
- LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
- Liquidity < $50k
- Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
- Owner can pause all transfers
- A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
- LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
- Liquidity < $50k ($47,810 across 1 pairs — thin market)
- Top-10 concentration > 30% (100.0% total → 48.2% effective; 16.2% in EOAs, 80.1% in contracts; 3.7% burned, locked or in pools excluded)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 25Holders
as of audit · Oct 25, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking80.1%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell16.2%
- Burnedout of circulation3.7%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 25, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 25The risk score reads depth across every pair.
Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.
Security Findings
MediumCentralized Minting Authority
The owner has the ability to increase the total supply of the token through the updateMintRate and release functions. This allows for the dilution of existing token holders' value at the discretion of the owner.CP-01
Issue
The owner has the ability to increase the total supply of the token through the updateMintRate and release functions. This allows for the dilution of existing token holders' value at the discretion of the owner.
Fix
Implement a timelock for minting operations or transition ownership to a decentralized governance structure to prevent arbitrary supply increases.
Status
Unresolved
MediumCentralized Transfer Control
The owner can use the lockPool and unlockPool functions to toggle a switch that determines whether transfers are allowed. This gives the owner the power to freeze user assets or halt trading at any time.CP-05
Issue
The owner can use the lockPool and unlockPool functions to toggle a switch that determines whether transfers are allowed. This gives the owner the power to freeze user assets or halt trading at any time.
Fix
Remove the ability to arbitrarily lock transfers or document the specific conditions under which this feature will be used to ensure transparency for users.
Status
Unresolved
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.7% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.1% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 2,313 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.7% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.1% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 2,313 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
2,313 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
2,313 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $48K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $90K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $48K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $90K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $48K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $48K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 25The contract utilizes well-audited OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20, Permitting, and Governance functionality. 7.1 Architecture is modular, and 7.2 Code Security is robust due to the use of standard, battle-tested implementations. 7.3 Access Control is strictly enforced via the Ownable pattern, though this creates a single point of failure. 7.6 External dependencies are minimal and standard for the ecosystem.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance aspects are heavily centralized under the contract owner. The owner has the ability to mint new tokens up to a 2% annual cap and can unilaterally halt transfers via the pool locking mechanism. This creates a trust-based environment where holders must rely on the owner's integrity for economic stability.
7.7 Upgrades are not supported as the contract is not a proxy. 7.8 Operations are limited to the owner's defined functions. The lack of upgradeability ensures immutability of the core logic, which is a positive security trait.
To improve security, consider transitioning the ownership to a decentralized multi-signature wallet or a DAO governance contract to mitigate the risks associated with a single administrative point of failure.
Additionally, implementing a timelock on sensitive functions like updateMintRate would provide transparency and allow the community to react to significant economic changes.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 25, 202664Medium
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the DOTF contract address?
The Digital Oil Trust Fund🔥 (DOTF) contract on Base is 0x1c30961f107e9330c6b697e86044ccb2a641177f. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Is Digital Oil Trust Fund🔥 a scam?
Quantum Audit's risk score for Digital Oil Trust Fund🔥 is 64/100 (Medium risk) as of Oct 25, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Retained; Mint: Mintable; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Who holds DOTF?
As of Oct 25, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 100.0% of the supply across 2,313 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Digital Oil Trust Fund🔥?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page