Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is CYCPAD a Scam?

BNB Chain
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Oct 24, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 1h old
SummaryAI Copilot

The CycpadToken is a minimal clone implementation of a bonding curve token.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Owner can change any holder's balance
  • Hidden owner — control survives an apparent renounce; held by factory: EOA, feerecipient: EOA
  • Owner can pause all transfers; held by factory: EOA, feerecipient: EOA
  • A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through; held by factory: EOA, feerecipient: EOA
  • Owner can change the buy/sell tax; held by factory: EOA, feerecipient: EOA
  • A privileged address can change transfer or wallet limits; held by factory: EOA, feerecipient: EOA
  • Liquidity < $50k
  • Volume/Liquidity > 15×
  • Code: Rounding Loss in Pricing
  • Code: Reentrancy Risk in ETH Transfers
Exact factors
  • Owner can change any holder's balance (seize or credit tokens); held by factory: EOA
  • Hidden owner — control survives an apparent renounce; held by factory: EOA, feerecipient: EOA
  • Owner can pause all transfers; held by factory: EOA, feerecipient: EOA
  • A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through; held by factory: EOA, feerecipient: EOA
  • Owner can change the buy/sell tax; held by factory: EOA, feerecipient: EOA
  • A privileged address can change transfer or wallet limits; held by factory: EOA, feerecipient: EOA
  • Liquidity < $50k ($20,794 across 3 pairs — thin market)
  • Volume/Liquidity > 15× (33.4× — wash-trading signal)
  • Code: Rounding Loss in Pricing (Low, static analysis)
  • Code: Reentrancy Risk in ETH Transfers (Medium, static analysis)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (1h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Oct 246 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipRenounced
MintNo mint
Liquidity lockLocked
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax1% / 1%

Holders

as of audit · Oct 24, 2026430 holders
7.5%Contracts11.5%Wallets29.1%DEX pools51.9%Everyone else
7.5%11.5%29.1%DEX pools51.9%Everyone else
ContractsWalletsDEX poolsEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply
48.1%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking7.5%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell11.5%
  • DEX poolsthe pools' own liquidity29.1%
  • Everyone else420 holders51.9%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads14.5%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 24, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Oct 24$20.8K across 3 pairs
LP tokensLocked

The LP tokens of the analysed pool are locked or burned.

Analysed pool$17.9KShare of depth86.0%
LP Burned100.0% · ≈ permanent lock
LP Locked100.0% · Null Address

Security Findings

1 High3 Medium2 Low6 Info
High

Privileged Balance Manipulation

The factory address can call buyFor and buyForQuote to modify the balances of any user, effectively allowing the burning or movement of tokens without user consent.CP-02

Issue

The factory address can call buyFor and buyForQuote to modify the balances of any user, effectively allowing the burning or movement of tokens without user consent.

Fix

Restrict the scope of these functions or remove the ability to target arbitrary addresses.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Reentrancy Risk in ETH Transfers

The _buyExact function updates state after an external ETH transfer, creating a reentrancy vulnerability.CD-02

Issue

The _buyExact function updates state after an external ETH transfer, creating a reentrancy vulnerability.

Fix

Apply the Checks-Effects-Interactions pattern by updating state before the external call.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Centralized Control over Transfer Logic

The factory and fee recipient can toggle switches that determine if transfers or sales are permitted, potentially freezing user assets.CP-05

Issue

The factory and fee recipient can toggle switches that determine if transfers or sales are permitted, potentially freezing user assets.

Fix

Implement a time-lock or governance vote for any changes to transfer-blocking switches.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Dynamic Fee Manipulation

Privileged roles can change transfer fees at will, which can be used to extract value from users unexpectedly.CP-07

Issue

Privileged roles can change transfer fees at will, which can be used to extract value from users unexpectedly.

Fix

Hardcode fee caps or require governance approval for fee adjustments.

Status

Unresolved

Low

Rounding Loss in Pricing

The _curveBuy function performs division before multiplication, leading to potential precision loss in token pricing.CD-01

Issue

The _curveBuy function performs division before multiplication, leading to potential precision loss in token pricing.

Fix

Reorder operations to multiply before dividing to maintain precision.

Status

Unresolved

Low

Privileged Limit Adjustments

Privileged roles can modify transaction and wallet limits, which may be used to restrict liquidity or target specific holders.CP-08

Issue

Privileged roles can modify transaction and wallet limits, which may be used to restrict liquidity or target specific holders.

Fix

Define limits in the constructor and make them immutable.

Status

Unresolved

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 48.1% of supply. Of that, 29.1% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 11.5% in wallets, 7.5% in other contracts. 430 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 48.1% of supply. Of that, 29.1% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 11.5% in wallets, 7.5% in other contracts. 430 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

430 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

430 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Liquidity burned — cannot be withdrawn

100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them. This assessment covers the main pool, which holds 86% of the token's DEX liquidity; the other pools were not assessed.QA-LIQUIDITY

Issue

100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them. This assessment covers the main pool, which holds 86% of the token's DEX liquidity; the other pools were not assessed.

Fix

Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $21K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $611K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $21K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $611K (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: nobody (ownership renounced). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: 1% on buy, 1% on sell. Market: $21K of DEX liquidity across 3 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: nobody (ownership renounced). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: 1% on buy, 1% on sell. Market: $21K of DEX liquidity across 3 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — less than a day of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 24
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The CycpadToken is a minimal clone implementation of a bonding curve token. While the contract ownership is renounced, the protocol relies on a factory and fee recipient address that maintain significant control over token economics, including the ability to move user balances and modify fee structures. The architecture is fixed and not upgradeable, which limits long-term flexibility but prevents malicious logic updates.

Technical6/10Medium risk

The contract utilizes a standard EIP-1167 minimal clone pattern, ensuring immutable logic. 7.1 Architecture is sound for a bonding curve, though 7.2 Code Security shows potential reentrancy risks in ETH transfer functions. 7.3 Access Control is partially centralized via factory and fee recipient roles, which can influence token state and transfer rules.

Governance5/10Medium risk

7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance risks are elevated due to the privileged roles held by the factory and fee recipient. These entities can unilaterally alter fees and transaction limits, directly impacting token liquidity and holder value. 7.6 External dependencies on the router for fee processing introduce additional trust requirements.

Upgrades6/10Medium risk

7.7 Upgrades are not applicable as the contract is a minimal clone with fixed bytecode. 7.8 Operations are restricted to the initial deployment parameters and the predefined privileged roles. No further logic changes are possible.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

Users should exercise caution due to the high level of control granted to the factory and fee recipient addresses.

We recommend that the protocol transition these privileged roles to a decentralized multi-signature wallet or a time-locked governance contract to mitigate the risk of unilateral changes to token economics. Developers should implement reentrancy guards on all functions that interact with external addresses and perform state updates before external calls to prevent potential fund drainage. Ensure that all mathematical operations are audited for precision loss, particularly in the bonding curve pricing logic.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeCycpadToken
NetworkBNB Chain
Token age1h
Contract0x325f…cccc
Deployer0xf6aa…7af0
Badge for your website
CYCPAD security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Oct 24, 202684High

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of CYCPAD?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page