Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
BNB ChainThe contract at the provided address is not verified on the block explorer, preventing any static or dynamic analysis of the source code.
Read the full analysisEach factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 24, 2026
The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are locked or burned.
The contract source code is not published on the block explorer, making it impossible to audit the logic for vulnerabilities or malicious backdoors.
Verify the contract source code on the block explorer immediately to allow for community and security review.
Unresolved
The contract is owned by an EOA (0x34f0...), which grants the owner full control over administrative functions without the transparency of a multi-sig or DAO.
Transfer ownership to a secure multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract.
Unresolved
The absence of verified code prevents users from understanding the tokenomics, including potential transfer taxes, blacklists, or liquidity lock mechanisms.
Publish the source code and provide documentation regarding the token's economic model.
Unresolved
The ten largest holders own 80.4% of supply. Of that, 9.1% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 71.3% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. 1,392 holders in total.
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Acknowledged
1,392 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Acknowledged
100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is locked in PinkLock02 until 31 Oct 2027 (371 days). Until then nobody — the project included — can withdraw it unless the locker contract itself is flawed; after that date the lock's owner can.
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Acknowledged
Liquidity $2.0M (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $260.9M (DexScreener, all pools).
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Acknowledged
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: a single wallet (EOA). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $2.0M of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Acknowledged
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Acknowledged
The contract at the provided address is not verified on the block explorer, preventing any static or dynamic analysis of the source code. As the logic is opaque, it is impossible to verify the presence of backdoors, tax mechanisms, or minting functions. Investors should exercise extreme caution as the contract owner is an EOA, which poses significant centralization risks.
7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security cannot be assessed due to the lack of verified source code. 7.3 Access Control is inherently risky as the owner is an EOA with no verifiable restrictions. 7.6 External dependencies and 7.8 Operations remain unknown, creating a high-risk environment for users.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance parameters are opaque. Without source code, it is impossible to determine if there are hidden minting capabilities or transfer taxes. The concentration of control in an EOA suggests a lack of decentralized governance.
7.7 Upgrades cannot be verified. Even if the contract is not a proxy, the lack of verification means the logic could be malicious or contain hidden upgrade-like functionality. No security guarantees can be provided.
Do not interact with this contract until the source code is verified on the block explorer and audited by a reputable third party.
The lack of transparency is a primary indicator of potential rug-pull risk or malicious intent.
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page
