The contract at the provided address is not verified on the Arbitrum block explorer. Consequently, the source code is unavailable for security analysis. Investors should exercise extreme caution as the lack of transparency prevents verification of ownership, tax mechanisms, or potential backdoors.
Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is Catena Labs a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The contract at the provided address is not verified on the Arbitrum block explorer.
Read the full analysis- Mint capability UNKNOWN
- Ownership status UNKNOWN
- Liquidity not locked
- Top-10 concentration > 70%
- Contract source not verified — its logic cannot be read
Exact factors
- Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
- Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
- Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool) — held by independent providers — market-depth risk
- Top-10 concentration > 70% (88.4% total → 75.1% effective; 75.1% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts; 13.3% burned, locked or in pools excluded)
- Contract source NOT verified — its logic cannot be read
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Nov 7Holders
as of audit · Nov 7, 2026- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell75.1%
- DEX poolsthe pools' own liquidity13.3%
- Everyone else2,168 holders11.6%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Nov 7, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Nov 7The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.
0x59b0…10c2No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.
Security Findings
CriticalUnverified Source Code
The contract source code is not verified on the block explorer, preventing any security assessment of the logic.C-01
Issue
The contract source code is not verified on the block explorer, preventing any security assessment of the logic.
Fix
Verify the contract source code on the block explorer immediately.
Status
Unresolved
HighLack of Transparency
Users cannot audit the contract for malicious functions, such as hidden minting, blacklisting, or tax manipulation.H-01
Issue
Users cannot audit the contract for malicious functions, such as hidden minting, blacklisting, or tax manipulation.
Fix
Publish the source code and provide a clear, audited documentation of the contract's functionality.
Status
Unresolved
MediumLiquidity not locked
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0x59b0…10c2 — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider.QA-LIQUIDITY
Issue
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0x59b0…10c2 — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider.
Fix
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 88.4% of supply. Of that, 13.3% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 75.1% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 8.7%. 2,178 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 88.4% of supply. Of that, 13.3% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 75.1% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 8.7%. 2,178 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
2,178 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
2,178 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $272K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $108K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $272K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $108K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $272K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $272K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Nov 7The technical architecture cannot be evaluated due to the absence of verified source code. 7.1 Architecture, 7.2 Code Security, 7.3 Access Control, and 7.6 External dependencies remain entirely opaque. Without bytecode analysis, it is impossible to determine if the contract contains malicious functions or standard ERC-20 compliance.
Economic parameters such as 7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance are unverifiable. There is no visibility into minting capabilities, tax logic, or ownership privileges. Investors are exposed to potential rug-pull risks as the contract logic remains hidden from the public.
7.7 Upgrades and 7.8 Operations cannot be assessed. It is unknown if the contract utilizes proxy patterns or immutable logic. The lack of verification prevents confirmation of whether the contract is upgradeable or if the owner can modify core parameters post-deployment.
Do not interact with or provide liquidity to this contract until the source code is verified on the block explorer.
Verify the contract through the standard compiler verification process to allow for a comprehensive security audit.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Nov 7, 202675High
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the CTALB contract address?
The Catena Labs (CTALB) contract on Arbitrum is 0x43a8465c709e38f4d006cc30907713337efb33e6. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Is Catena Labs a scam?
Quantum Audit's risk score for Catena Labs is 75/100 (High risk) as of Nov 7, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Not verified; Liquidity lock: Not locked; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Is CTALB liquidity locked?
Liquidity lock: Not locked (as of Nov 7, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $271.9K.
Who holds CTALB?
As of Nov 7, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 88.4% of the supply across 2,178 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Catena Labs?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified