Quantum Audit Logo

Is CATALYST a Scam?

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

CATALYST CATALYST
0xca7a…6b05
Base
Not verifiedThis record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.
Last checked today 1 audit on record New Launch · 1d old
DexScreener ↗
How is this score calculated? → High Risk
Executive SummaryAI Copilot

No contract source code was provided for the address 0xca7a1e31b36779cf32acb18714ab26982cf36b05. Therefore, a comprehensive security audit could not be performed. The risk assessment below is based on the absence of information and should not be considered an actual evaluation of the contract's security posture.

1 Informational
! Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (1d old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.
Volume 24h
$9.16M
Liquidity
$1.12M
Price
$1.7000
Token Age
1d
Top 10 Holders
42.6%

Security Findings

1 Info
Info

No Source Code Provided for Audit

I-01The smart contract at address 0xca7a…6b05 was submitted for audit without its corresponding Solidity source code. This prevents any form of static analysis, dynamic analysis, or manual code review.
IssueThe smart contract at address was submitted for audit without its corresponding Solidity source code. This prevents any form of static analysis, dynamic analysis, or manual code review.
FixTo enable a comprehensive security audit, the full and verified Solidity source code for the contract must be provided. It is highly recommended to verify contract source code on block explorers for transparency and community trust.
StatusUnresolved

Category Ratings

TechnicalMedium6/10

Without access to the contract's source code, a technical security assessment (7.1 Architecture, 7.2 Code Security, 7.3 Access Control) cannot be performed. No specific strengths or weaknesses can be identified regarding reentrancy, integer overflows, or other common code-level vulnerabilities. Therefore, no concrete examples can be provided.

GovernanceHigh2/10

An economic and governance risk assessment (7.4 Economic, 7.5 Governance) requires understanding the contract's logic, tokenomics, and administrative controls. Without source code, it is impossible to evaluate potential economic exploits, oracle dependencies, or governance mechanisms. No specific examples can be provided.

UpgradesMedium6/10

The upgradeability status (7.7 Upgrades) of the contract cannot be determined without its source code. It is unknown if the contract uses a proxy pattern (e.g., UUPS, Transparent) or is immutable. Therefore, no assessment of upgrade safety or potential risks associated with upgrade mechanisms can be made.

Security Checklist

1/5 checks passed
Contract VerifiedFail
Ownership Renounced?
No Mint Function?
Liquidity LockedFail
Not a ProxyPass
HoneypotNoneBuy Tax0.0%Sell Tax0.0%

Holder Composition

42.6% in top 10
10.3% in wallets32.3% in contracts
Effective Concentration23.2%

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Liquidity Depth

$1.17M across 30 pairs
Uniswap v4USDCanalysed$1.12M96.1%Uniswap v4USDC$10.6K0.9%Uniswap v4USDC$5.3K0.5%Uniswap v4USDC$5.1K0.4%Uniswap v4USDC$3.3K0.3%Uniswap v4USDC$3.3K0.3%
Show 4 more pairsShow less
Uniswap v4ETH$2.9K0.2%Uniswap v4USDC$2.3K0.2%Uniswap v4USDC$2.1K0.2%Uniswap v4USDC$2.1K0.2%

The 20 remaining pairs hold $8.6K between them and are not listed.

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

LP Distribution

Top-1 Unlocked Holder94.3%
Top-3 Unlocked100.0%

Key Addresses

3 addresses
Deployer
0xe45a…a95a
Unlocked LP Held By
0xa471…cd470xd5a8…31a6

No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.

What Raised This Score

8 factors
  • Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
  • Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
  • Contract source NOT verified
  • Top-10 concentration > 20% (42.6% total → 23.2% effective; 10.3% in EOAs, 32.3% in contracts — mild)
  • Liquidity not locked, but no owner/deployer address holds LP — market-depth risk, not rug risk
  • LP top1 unlocked holder = 94.3% (independent LP — depth risk, pool = 96% of DEX liquidity)
  • LP top3 unlocked holders = 100.0% (independent LP — depth risk, pool = 96% of DEX liquidity)
  • Token age < 7 days (early, volatile)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Related Audits

6 more on the record
Metronome Synth ETH (MSETH)High RiskOpenUSDT (OUSDT)High RiskPingHigh RiskVenice Token (VVV)High RiskAvantis (AVNT)High RiskSupergemma4-26b-multimodal (SUPERGEMMA)High Risk

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of CATALYST?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit