Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is Cambria a Scam?

RSGPBase
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Oct 29, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 0h old
SummaryAI Copilot

The BurnMintERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional minting and burning capabilities managed via OpenZeppelin AccessControl.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • Liquidity not locked
  • Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool; this pool is 71% of DEX liquidity) — held by independent providers — market-depth risk
  • Top-10 concentration > 30% (100.0% total → 49.8% effective; 16.4% in EOAs, 83.5% in contracts; deployer/owner holds 80.8%)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (0h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Oct 294 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipRetained
MintMintable
Liquidity lockNot locked
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Oct 29, 202611 holders
83.5%Contracts16.4%Wallets
83.5%Contracts16.4%Wallets
ContractsWalletsBubble area = share of supply
100.0%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking83.5%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell16.4%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads49.8%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 29, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Oct 29$391.0K across 9 pairs
LP tokensNot locked

The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.

Analysed pool$275.7KShare of depth70.5%
Top-1 Unlocked Holder74.3%
Top-3 Unlocked100.0%
Unlocked LP held by
0x0817…d6270x9178…abcf0xa92a…4ab80x3ca6…9b91

No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.

Security Findings

1 High2 Medium4 Info
High

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. What remains: 16.4% in wallets, 83.5% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 80.8%. A holder that also controls the contract can sell into its own liquidity. 11 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. What remains: 16.4% in wallets, 83.5% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 80.8%. A holder that also controls the contract can sell into its own liquidity. 11 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Medium

Centralized Minting Authority

The mint(address,uint256) function allows addresses with the MINTER_ROLE to create new tokens at will. This increases the total supply and dilutes the value of existing holdings, representing a significant centralization risk.CP-01

Issue

The mint(address,uint256) function allows addresses with the MINTER_ROLE to create new tokens at will. This increases the total supply and dilutes the value of existing holdings, representing a significant centralization risk.

Fix

Restrict the MINTER_ROLE to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract to ensure that minting events are transparent and subject to community oversight.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Liquidity not locked

0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 3 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0x0817…d627 — holds 74.3% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them. This assessment covers the main pool, which holds 71% of the token's DEX liquidity; the other pools were not assessed.QA-LIQUIDITY

Issue

0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 3 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0x0817…d627 — holds 74.3% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them. This assessment covers the main pool, which holds 71% of the token's DEX liquidity; the other pools were not assessed.

Fix

Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

11 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

11 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $391K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $711K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $391K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $711K (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: an owner key. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $391K of DEX liquidity across 9 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: an owner key. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $391K of DEX liquidity across 9 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — less than a day of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 29
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The BurnMintERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional minting and burning capabilities managed via OpenZeppelin AccessControl. The architecture is robust, utilizing battle-tested libraries for core functionality. The primary risk is centralized control over supply expansion, which is inherent to the design of this token type.

Technical8/10Low risk

The contract leverages standard OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20 and AccessControl, ensuring high code quality and reliability. 7.1 Architecture follows standard patterns, while 7.2 Code Security is maintained through well-defined state transitions. 7.3 Access Control is correctly implemented using role-based modifiers. 7.6 External dependencies are limited to trusted standard libraries.

Governance2/10High risk

7.4 Economic risk is centered on the minting authority, which can dilute token holders. 7.5 Governance is managed via role-based access, allowing for granular control over administrative actions. The ability to grant minting roles dynamically requires careful management of the admin address. No automated governance mechanisms are present.

Upgrades3/10High risk

7.7 Upgrades are not supported as the contract is not a proxy. 7.8 Operations are straightforward, relying on standard ERC-20 interfaces. The lack of upgradeability ensures immutability of the logic, which is a positive security feature for token holders.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

The protocol should implement a multi-signature wallet or a time-locked governance contract to manage the MINTER_ROLE.

This prevents a single compromised key from unilaterally inflating the token supply. Ensure that the address assigned to the DEFAULT_ADMIN_ROLE is highly secured, as it holds the power to reassign all other roles within the system.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeToken
NetworkBase
Token age0h
Contract0x44b6…9e85
Deployer0xc666…21b9
Badge for your website
Cambria security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Oct 29, 202654Medium

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the RSGP contract address?

The Cambria (RSGP) contract on Base is 0x44b63af715d5ef02cc3646a6ce96875e11d69e85. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.

Is Cambria a scam?

Quantum Audit's risk score for Cambria is 54/100 (Medium risk) as of Oct 29, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Retained; Mint: Mintable; Liquidity lock: Not locked; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.

Is RSGP liquidity locked?

Liquidity lock: Not locked (as of Oct 29, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $391.0K.

Who holds RSGP?

As of Oct 29, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 100.0% of the supply across 11 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Cambria?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified