The FlapTaxTokenV3 is a minimal clone (EIP-1167) implementation of an ERC-20 token with custom tax and migration logic. The contract ownership has been renounced on-chain, rendering all privileged administrative functions (startMigration, finalizeMigration) permanently dormant. The architecture is immutable and secure against unauthorized state changes.
Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is BNCB stocks1131542192 a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The FlapTaxTokenV3 is a minimal clone (EIP-1167) implementation of an ERC-20 token with custom tax and migration logic.
Read the full analysis- Liquidity not locked
- Liquidity < $50k
- Top-10 concentration > 20%
Exact factors
- Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool) — held by independent providers — market-depth risk
- Liquidity < $50k ($19,319 across 2 pairs — thin market)
- Top-10 concentration > 20% (35.1% total → 21.4% effective; 12.2% in EOAs, 22.9% in contracts)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 23Holders
as of audit · Oct 23, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking22.9%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell12.2%
- Everyone else47,627 holders64.9%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 23, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 23The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.
0xddac…308cNo privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.
Security Findings
MediumLiquidity not locked
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0xddac…308c — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY
Issue
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0xddac…308c — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
Fix
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNo issues identified in the reviewed source
The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint/owner authority, mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.I-01
Issue
The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint/owner authority, mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.
Fix
Re-check after any contract upgrade or ownership change, both of which can alter behaviour without changing this page.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 35.1% of supply. What remains: 12.2% in wallets, 22.9% in other contracts. 47,637 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 35.1% of supply. What remains: 12.2% in wallets, 22.9% in other contracts. 47,637 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
47,637 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
47,637 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $19K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $192K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $19K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $192K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: nobody (ownership renounced). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: 3% on buy, 2.97% on sell. Market: $19K of DEX liquidity across 2 pools. Launch: 1 days of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: nobody (ownership renounced). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: 3% on buy, 2.97% on sell. Market: $19K of DEX liquidity across 2 pools. Launch: 1 days of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — 1 day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is 1 day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is 1 day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 23The contract utilizes standard OpenZeppelin upgradeable patterns correctly within an EIP-1167 clone structure. 7.1 Architecture is robust due to the immutable nature of the minimal clone. 7.2 Code Security is high, adhering to standard ERC-20 and EIP-712 specifications. 7.3 Access Control is effectively locked via renounced ownership, preventing any future unauthorized modifications to the pool state.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance risks are mitigated by the renunciation of ownership. No external party can trigger the migration functions, ensuring the token's tax and anti-farmer logic remains static. 7.6 External dependencies are limited to standard, audited OpenZeppelin libraries.
7.7 Upgrades are impossible as the contract is a minimal clone pointing to a fixed implementation. 7.8 Operations are stable because the contract logic cannot be altered post-deployment. The lack of upgradeability is a security feature in this context, ensuring long-term consistency for token holders.
The protocol is in a secure, immutable state. No further action is required as the administrative functions are permanently disabled due to the renounced ownership.
Users can interact with the token with the assurance that the underlying logic cannot be modified by any party.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 23, 202625Low
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of BNCB stocks1131542192?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page