The contract at the provided address is not verified on the Base block explorer. Consequently, the source code is unavailable for security analysis. Investors should exercise extreme caution as the lack of transparency prevents verification of ownership, tax mechanisms, or potential backdoors.
Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is Believe in Something a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The contract at the provided address is not verified on the Base block explorer.
Read the full analysis- Mint capability UNKNOWN
- Ownership status UNKNOWN
- LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
- Top-10 concentration > 50%
- Contract source not verified — its logic cannot be read
Exact factors
- Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
- Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
- LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
- Top-10 concentration > 50% (51.3% total → 51.3% effective; 51.3% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts)
- Contract source NOT verified — its logic cannot be read
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 28Holders
as of audit · Oct 28, 2026- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell51.3%
- Everyone else806 holders48.7%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 28, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 28The risk score reads depth across every pair.
Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.
Security Findings
CriticalUnverified Contract Source Code
The contract source code is not published on the block explorer, preventing any security assessment of the logic, ownership, or token mechanics.C-01
Issue
The contract source code is not published on the block explorer, preventing any security assessment of the logic, ownership, or token mechanics.
Fix
Verify the contract source code on the block explorer and provide a link to the repository for public audit.
Status
Unresolved
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 51.3% of supply. What remains: 51.3% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 12.1%. 816 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 51.3% of supply. What remains: 51.3% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 12.1%. 816 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
816 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
816 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $183K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $1.3M (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $183K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $1.3M (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $183K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $183K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 287.1 Architecture: Unknown. 7.2 Code Security: Cannot be verified due to lack of source code. 7.3 Access Control: Cannot be verified. 7.6 External: Interactions with external protocols remain opaque.
7.4 Economic: Tokenomics and tax logic are hidden from the public. 7.5 Governance: Administrative privileges cannot be audited. The risk of rug-pulls or malicious minting is significantly elevated.
7.7 Upgrades: The upgradeability status is unknown. 7.8 Operations: Operational security cannot be assessed without access to the contract logic or deployment documentation.
Do not interact with this contract until the source code is verified on the block explorer and subjected to a professional security audit.
Without transparency, it is impossible to distinguish this contract from malicious actors or honeypots.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 28, 202671High
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the SOMETHING contract address?
The Believe in Something (SOMETHING) contract on Base is 0xcd289c23b682a2109743df8709a9d65ba4052a20. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Is Believe in Something a scam?
Quantum Audit's risk score for Believe in Something is 71/100 (High risk) as of Oct 28, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Not verified; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Who holds SOMETHING?
As of Oct 28, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 51.3% of the supply across 816 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Believe in Something?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified