Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is Beagle a Scam?

BGLEBase

Not verified

This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →

Last checked Nov 3, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 3h old

Chart

78/ 100

High RiskHow is this score calculated?

How the score breaks downratings: 10 is safest

Technical6/10 Governance1/10 Upgrades6/10 Checks passed4 of 7 Findings3 Medium · 5 Info8

SummaryAI Copilot

The DopplerERC20V1 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with governance voting capabilities, deployed as an EIP-1167 minimal clone.

Read the full analysis

What raised the score

A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through; held by controller: EOA
LP lock status UNKNOWN — the deepest pool's LP could not be read; this pool is 100% of DEX liquidity
Liquidity not locked
Liquidity < $50k
Top-10 concentration > 30%
Contract source not verified — its logic cannot be read
Code: Inability to Withdraw ETH

Exact factors

A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through; held by controller: EOA
LP lock status UNKNOWN — the deepest pool's LP could not be read; this pool is 100% of DEX liquidity
Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool; this pool is 0% of DEX liquidity) — held by independent providers — market-depth risk
Liquidity < $50k ($29,052 across 4 pairs — thin market)
Top-10 concentration > 30% (91.9% total → 41.1% effective; 7.2% in EOAs, 84.7% in contracts)
Contract source NOT verified — its logic cannot be read
Code: Inability to Withdraw ETH (Medium, static analysis)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (3h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Nov 34 of 7 checks passed

Contract verifiedNot verified

OwnershipRetained

MintNo mint

Liquidity lockNot locked

UpgradeabilityFixed code

HoneypotNone found

Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Nov 3, 202679 holders

ContractsWalletsEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply

91.9%of supply sits with the top 10 holders

Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking84.7%
Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell7.2%
Everyone else69 holders8.1%

Effective concentrationwhat the score reads41.1%

How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Nov 3, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Nov 3$29.1K across 4 pairs

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensNot locked

The LP tokens of the checked pool, Uniswap v4, are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity. The LP of the deepest pool (99.9% of depth) could not be read, so whether it is locked is unknown.

Checked pool$19Share of depth0.1%

Top-1 Unlocked Holder100.0%

Top-3 Unlocked100.0%

Unlocked LP held by

0x0dad…d24e

No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.

Security Findings

3 Medium5 Info

Medium

Inability to Withdraw ETH

The contract accepts ETH but lacks any function to withdraw or transfer it out. Any ETH sent to the contract address will be permanently locked and inaccessible to the protocol or its users.CD-01

Issue

The contract accepts ETH but lacks any function to withdraw or transfer it out. Any ETH sent to the contract address will be permanently locked and inaccessible to the protocol or its users.

Fix

Add a function restricted to the owner that allows for the withdrawal of any ETH held by the contract.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Centralized Control Over Token Transfers

The owner and controller have the ability to lock pools and disable balance limits, which effectively allows them to halt or restrict token transfers for users. This creates a centralized point of failure where the protocol's utility can be unilaterally suspended.CP-05

Issue

Fix

Implement a timelock for all administrative actions that affect transferability to provide users with notice, or transition these controls to a decentralized governance contract.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Liquidity not locked

0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0x0dad…d24e — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY

Issue

Fix

Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 91.9% of supply. What remains: 7.2% in wallets, 84.7% in other contracts. 79 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 91.9% of supply. What remains: 7.2% in wallets, 84.7% in other contracts. 79 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

79 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

79 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $29K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $87K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $29K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $87K (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Governance token

A token whose main use is voting on a protocol's decisions (delegation and vote checkpoints in its code). The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: vote delegation in its code. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $29K of DEX liquidity across 4 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

Fix

Check how much of the voting supply insiders hold and what governance can change.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — less than a day of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Nov 3

Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The DopplerERC20V1 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with governance voting capabilities, deployed as an EIP-1167 minimal clone. The architecture is immutable, preventing logic upgrades. While the core token functionality is standard, the contract includes centralized administrative controls that allow the owner or controller to restrict token transfers and manage balance limits. Two primary issues were identified: the presence of centralized transfer-blocking mechanisms and the inability to recover accidentally sent ETH.

Technical6/10Medium risk

The contract utilizes standard OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20 and governance features, ensuring robust base logic. 7.1 Architecture: EIP-1167 clone pattern is correctly implemented for gas efficiency. 7.2 Code Security: The logic is clean and follows standard patterns, though it lacks a mechanism to recover trapped funds. 7.3 Access Control: Privileged functions are correctly guarded by Ownable and controller roles.

Governance1/10High risk

7.4 Economic: The token includes balance limits and pool locking mechanisms that directly impact liquidity and transferability. 7.5 Governance: The owner holds significant power to modify transfer rules, which could be used to freeze user assets. 7.8 Operations: The lack of an ETH withdrawal function creates a permanent loss risk for any funds sent to the contract address.

Upgrades6/10Medium risk

7.7 Upgrades: The contract is an EIP-1167 minimal clone, which is inherently immutable. The implementation address is fixed at deployment, preventing any future logic changes. This eliminates the risk of malicious implementation upgrades but requires high confidence in the initial code.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

The protocol should implement a 'withdrawETH' function restricted to the owner to allow for the recovery of accidentally sent funds.

Additionally, the team should provide clear documentation or a public-facing policy regarding the use of the 'lockPool' and 'disableBalanceLimit' functions to maintain transparency with token holders, as these functions directly impact the ability to trade the token.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record

TypeProxy, Token

NetworkBase

Token age3h

Contract0xb8a4…dba3

Deployer0xf2b6…849d

Badge for your website

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History

Nov 3, 202678High

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the BGLE contract address?

The Beagle (BGLE) contract on Base is 0xb8a49d0e436512b462365496974f5e3dafaddba3. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.