The contract at the provided address is not verified on the Base block explorer. Consequently, the source code is unavailable for security analysis. Investors should exercise extreme caution as the lack of transparency prevents verification of ownership, tax mechanisms, or potential backdoors.
Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is BaranosAI a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The contract at the provided address is not verified on the Base block explorer.
Read the full analysis- Mint capability UNKNOWN
- Ownership status UNKNOWN
- Liquidity not locked
- Top-10 concentration > 70%
- Contract source not verified — its logic cannot be read
Exact factors
- Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
- Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
- Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool) — who holds it cannot be verified
- Top-10 concentration > 70% (90.3% total → 76.8% effective; 67.7% in EOAs, 22.6% in contracts)
- Contract source NOT verified — its logic cannot be read
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Nov 7Holders
as of audit · Nov 7, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking22.6%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell67.7%
- Everyone else1,740 holders9.7%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Nov 7, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Nov 7The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.
0x9519…92df0x9bd2…168cSecurity Findings
CriticalUnverified Contract Source Code
The contract source code is not verified on the Base block explorer. This prevents any security assessment of the contract's logic, ownership, or potential malicious functionality.C-01
Issue
The contract source code is not verified on the Base block explorer. This prevents any security assessment of the contract's logic, ownership, or potential malicious functionality.
Fix
Verify the contract source code on the block explorer to allow for transparency and independent security review.
Status
Unresolved
MediumLiquidity not locked
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 2 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0x9519…92df — holds 99.8% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider.QA-LIQUIDITY
Issue
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 2 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0x9519…92df — holds 99.8% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider.
Fix
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 90.3% of supply. What remains: 67.7% in wallets, 22.6% in other contracts. 1,750 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 90.3% of supply. What remains: 67.7% in wallets, 22.6% in other contracts. 1,750 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
1,750 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
1,750 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $68K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $122K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $68K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $122K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $68K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $68K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Nov 77.1 Architecture: Unknown. 7.2 Code Security: Unverifiable. 7.3 Access Control: Unverifiable. 7.6 External: Unverifiable. The absence of verified source code makes it impossible to assess the technical integrity or security posture of the contract.
7.4 Economic: Unverifiable. 7.5 Governance: Unverifiable. 7.8 Operations: Unverifiable. Without access to the contract logic, it is impossible to determine if there are hidden minting functions, transfer taxes, or liquidity locking mechanisms.
7.7 Upgrades: Unverifiable. It is unknown if the contract utilizes proxy patterns or immutable logic. There is no way to confirm if the contract owner has the ability to modify logic post-deployment.
Do not interact with this contract until the source code is verified on the block explorer.
Verify the contract and perform a comprehensive security audit before committing any capital to ensure the contract logic is safe and free of malicious functions.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Nov 7, 202679High
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the BARANOS contract address?
The BaranosAI (BARANOS) contract on Base is 0x7159f9c0906a51e1300273c4eb19c59fe6c1efd8. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Is BaranosAI a scam?
Quantum Audit's risk score for BaranosAI is 79/100 (High risk) as of Nov 7, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Not verified; Liquidity lock: Not locked; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Is BARANOS liquidity locked?
Liquidity lock: Not locked (as of Nov 7, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $68.4K.
Who holds BARANOS?
As of Nov 7, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 90.3% of the supply across 1,750 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of BaranosAI?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified