The contract at the provided address is not verified on the Base block explorer. Consequently, the source code is unavailable for security review. Investors should exercise extreme caution as the lack of transparency prevents verification of ownership, tax mechanisms, or liquidity lock status.
Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is AWP a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The contract at the provided address is not verified on the Base block explorer.
Read the full analysis- Mint capability UNKNOWN
- Ownership status UNKNOWN
- Liquidity not locked
- Top-10 concentration > 70%
- Contract source not verified — its logic cannot be read
Exact factors
- Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
- Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
- Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool) — who holds it cannot be verified
- Top-10 concentration > 70% (91.5% total → 74.4% effective; 68.4% in EOAs, 14.9% in contracts; 8.2% burned, locked or in pools excluded)
- Contract source NOT verified — its logic cannot be read
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Nov 3Holders
as of audit · Nov 3, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking14.9%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell68.4%
- DEX poolsthe pools' own liquidity8.2%
- Everyone else1,729 holders8.5%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Nov 3, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Nov 3The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.
0x6183…c593Security Findings
CriticalUnverified Source Code
The contract source code is not published on the block explorer, preventing any security analysis or verification of logic.C-01
Issue
The contract source code is not published on the block explorer, preventing any security analysis or verification of logic.
Fix
Publish and verify the source code on the block explorer to allow for community and security review.
Status
Unresolved
HighOpaque Governance and Access Control
Without source code, it is impossible to identify administrative privileges, minting capabilities, or potential backdoors.H-01
Issue
Without source code, it is impossible to identify administrative privileges, minting capabilities, or potential backdoors.
Fix
Ensure all administrative functions are documented and subject to timelocks or multi-signature requirements.
Status
Unresolved
MediumPotential for Malicious Logic
Unverified contracts frequently contain hidden mechanisms such as honeypot logic, transfer taxes, or liquidity withdrawal functions.M-01
Issue
Unverified contracts frequently contain hidden mechanisms such as honeypot logic, transfer taxes, or liquidity withdrawal functions.
Fix
Avoid interacting with unverified contracts to prevent loss of funds due to hidden malicious logic.
Status
Unresolved
MediumLiquidity not locked
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0x6183…c593 — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider.QA-LIQUIDITY
Issue
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0x6183…c593 — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider.
Fix
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 91.5% of supply. Of that, 8.2% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 68.4% in wallets, 14.9% in other contracts. 1,739 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 91.5% of supply. Of that, 8.2% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 68.4% in wallets, 14.9% in other contracts. 1,739 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
1,739 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
1,739 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $223K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $93K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $223K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $93K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $223K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $223K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Nov 37.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security cannot be assessed due to the absence of source code. 7.3 Access Control mechanisms are opaque, meaning potential backdoors or minting functions remain hidden. 7.6 External dependencies and 7.8 Operations are unknown, posing a significant risk of rug-pulls or malicious logic.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance parameters are entirely opaque. Without source code, it is impossible to determine if there are hidden transfer taxes, blacklists, or centralized control over liquidity. Investors are advised to assume maximum risk regarding tokenomics and governance.
7.7 Upgrades status is unknown. If the contract is a proxy, it could be upgraded to malicious logic at any time. Without verification, there is no way to confirm if the contract is immutable or controlled by an upgradeable proxy pattern.
Do not interact with this contract. The inability to verify the source code makes it impossible to distinguish between a legitimate project and a malicious one.
Prioritize assets with verified, audited, and transparent source code to ensure the safety of your funds.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Nov 3, 202679High
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the AWP contract address?
The AWP contract on Base is 0xc9af3d36f0278c19b1cae50d67d263950e1fc540. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Is AWP a scam?
Quantum Audit's risk score for AWP is 79/100 (High risk) as of Nov 3, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Not verified; Liquidity lock: Not locked; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Is AWP liquidity locked?
Liquidity lock: Not locked (as of Nov 3, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $223.0K.
Who holds AWP?
As of Nov 3, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 91.5% of the supply across 1,739 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of AWP?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified