The CollectionToken contract implements a standard ERC-20 token with additional administrative controls for metadata management and transfer restrictions. The architecture is straightforward, utilizing a centralized owner model for configuration and a hook-based system for liquidity-related swap allowances. No critical or high-severity vulnerabilities were identified during the static analysis of the provided source code.

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is ApeBall a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The CollectionToken contract implements a standard ERC-20 token with additional administrative controls for metadata management and transfer restrictions.
Read the full analysis- Owner can pause all transfers
- Liquidity not locked
- Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
- Owner can pause all transfers
- Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool) — held by independent providers — market-depth risk
- Top-10 concentration > 30% (77.8% total → 38.9% effective; 13.0% in EOAs, 64.8% in contracts)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Nov 4Holders
as of audit · Nov 4, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking64.8%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell13.0%
- Everyone else83 holders22.2%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Nov 4, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Nov 4The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.
0x9434…e309No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.
Security Findings
HighWhat the token's controller can do
The contract lets its controller — an owner key — pause all transfers. Nothing independent vouches for whoever holds them, so each is a live risk to holders.QA-POWERS
Issue
The contract lets its controller — an owner key — pause all transfers. Nothing independent vouches for whoever holds them, so each is a live risk to holders.
Fix
Check who holds these powers and whether a timelock or multisig stands between them and holders.
Status
Acknowledged
MediumLiquidity not locked
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0x9434…e309 — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY
Issue
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0x9434…e309 — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
Fix
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNo issues identified in the reviewed source
The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint/owner authority, mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.I-01
Issue
The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint/owner authority, mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.
Fix
Re-check after any contract upgrade or ownership change, both of which can alter behaviour without changing this page.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 77.8% of supply. What remains: 13.0% in wallets, 64.8% in other contracts. 93 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 77.8% of supply. What remains: 13.0% in wallets, 64.8% in other contracts. 93 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
93 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
93 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $168K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $201K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $168K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $201K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner key. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $168K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner key. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $168K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Nov 4The contract demonstrates robust implementation of ERC-20 standards and clean state management. 7.1 Architecture is modular, separating metadata updates from core token logic. 7.2 Code Security is maintained through standard Solidity patterns and memory-safe assembly for transient storage. 7.3 Access Control is strictly enforced via owner-only modifiers for administrative functions.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance aspects are centralized under the owner role. While this provides efficiency, it represents a single point of failure for metadata and transfer rule configurations. 7.6 External dependencies are limited to the liquidity hook, which is correctly validated before allowing swap transfers.
7.7 Upgrades are not applicable as the contract is not a proxy. 7.8 Operations are handled through explicit administrative functions that allow for controlled updates to metadata and venue permissions. The lack of upgradeability ensures immutability of the core logic.
The contract is well-implemented and secure for its intended use case.
We recommend maintaining the current administrative security practices, such as using a multi-signature wallet for the owner address to mitigate risks associated with centralized control.
Ensure that any future integrations with the liquidity hook are thoroughly tested, as the allowSwapTransfer function relies on the integrity of the external hook address to manage transient swap allowances.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Nov 4, 202642Medium
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of ApeBall?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified