Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is AOP a Scam?

Base
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Oct 23, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 4h old
SummaryAI Copilot

The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional governance and vesting features.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Owner can pause all transfers
  • A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
  • Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
  • Owner can pause all transfers
  • A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
  • Top-10 concentration > 30% (100.0% total → 48.2% effective; 16.2% in EOAs, 80.0% in contracts; 3.8% burned, locked or in pools excluded)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (4h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Oct 234 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipRetained
MintMintable
Liquidity lockUnknown
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Oct 23, 20266,011 holders
80.0%Contracts16.2%Wallets3.8%
80.0%Contracts16.2%Wallets3.8%
ContractsWalletsBurnedBubble area = share of supply
100.0%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking80.0%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell16.2%
  • Burnedout of circulation3.8%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads48.2%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 23, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Oct 23$74.1K

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensUnknown

Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.

Analysed pool$74.1KShare of depth100.0%

Security Findings

2 Medium5 Info
Medium

Centralized Control Over Token Supply

The owner can call updateMintRate and release to mint new tokens, which increases the total supply and dilutes the value of existing holdings.CP-01

Issue

The owner can call updateMintRate and release to mint new tokens, which increases the total supply and dilutes the value of existing holdings.

Fix

Implement a timelock on minting functions or transition ownership to a decentralized governance contract.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Centralized Control Over Transferability

The owner can use lockPool and unlockPool to toggle a switch that determines whether transfers are permitted, effectively freezing or unfreezing token movement at will.CP-05

Issue

The owner can use lockPool and unlockPool to toggle a switch that determines whether transfers are permitted, effectively freezing or unfreezing token movement at will.

Fix

Remove the ability to arbitrarily pause transfers or restrict this functionality to emergency-only scenarios managed by a decentralized multisig.

Status

Unresolved

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 6,011 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 6,011 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

6,011 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

6,011 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $74K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $96K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $74K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $96K (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $74K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $74K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — less than a day of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 23
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional governance and vesting features. The protocol relies on a centralized owner to manage token inflation and pool access. While the code follows standard OpenZeppelin patterns, the high level of administrative control over supply and transferability introduces significant trust requirements for token holders.

Technical8/10Low risk

The architecture utilizes standard OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20, Votes, and Permit functionality, ensuring robust base security. 7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security are well-implemented, adhering to modern Solidity practices. However, 7.3 Access Control is highly centralized, granting the owner significant influence over contract state. The implementation of 7.6 External interactions is minimal, reducing the attack surface for reentrancy or flash loan exploits.

Governance3/10High risk

The economic model is governed by the owner, who controls inflation via updateMintRate and vesting releases. 7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance items are heavily reliant on the owner's address, which is a 3-of-6 multisig. This structure provides a layer of protection against single-point-of-failure but remains a centralized control mechanism. Token holders should be aware that supply dilution is possible within the defined 2% annual limit.

Upgrades4/10Medium risk

The contract is not upgradeable, which eliminates 7.7 Upgrades risks related to proxy logic. 7.8 Operations are straightforward, with no complex migration paths required. The immutability of the logic provides certainty to users regarding the contract's behavior over time.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

The protocol should consider transitioning the owner role to a decentralized DAO or a time-locked contract to mitigate the risks associated with centralized control.

Implementing a timelock on sensitive functions like updateMintRate would provide transparency and allow the community to react to administrative changes.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeToken
NetworkBase
Token age4h
Contract0xbde0…9d78
Deployer0x8fde…0f04
Badge for your website
AOP security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Oct 23, 202658Medium

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of AOP?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page