Quantum Audit Logo

Is Agentum a Scam?

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Agentum AGT
0xa83d…5031
Arbitrum
Not verifiedThis record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.
Last checked today 1 audit on record New Launch · 23h old
DexScreener ↗
How is this score calculated? → High Risk
Executive SummaryAI Copilot

No Solidity source code was provided for analysis. This report reflects a theoretical assessment based on the absence of code, and no specific vulnerabilities could be identified or verified. A comprehensive security audit requires full access to the contract's implementation.

6 Informational
! Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (23h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.
Volume 24h
$181.4K
Liquidity
$78.7K
Price
$0.1573
Token Age
23h
Top 10 Holders
92.6%

Security Findings

6 Info
Info

Missing Source Code for Analysis

I-01The Solidity source code for the contract at address 0xa83d…5031 was not provided. Without access to the contract's implementation details, a comprehensive security audit cannot be performed. This prevents the identification of specific vulnerabilities related to architecture (7.1), code security (7.2), access control (7.3), economic models (7.4), governance (7.5), external interactions (7.6), and upgrade mechanisms (7.7), and operational aspects (7.8).
IssueThe Solidity source code for the contract at address was not provided. Without access to the contract's implementation details, a comprehensive security audit cannot be performed. This prevents the identification of specific vulnerabilities related to architecture (7.1), code security (7.2), access control (7.3), economic models (7.4), governance (7.5), external interactions (7.6), and upgrade mechanisms (7.7), and operational aspects (7.8).
FixProvide the complete and verified Solidity source code for the contract. It is highly recommended to verify the source code on block explorers (e.g., Arbiscan) to ensure transparency and allow for public scrutiny and security analysis.
StatusUnresolved
Info

Who holds the supply

QA-HOLDERSThe ten largest holders own 92.6% of supply. What remains: 92.6% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 1.4%. 424 holders in total.
IssueThe ten largest holders own 92.6% of supply. What remains: 92.6% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 1.4%. 424 holders in total.
FixWatch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Not listed by any independent source

QA-IDENTITY424 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Issue424 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
FixMatch the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

The market for this token

QA-MARKETLiquidity $79K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $181K (DexScreener, all pools).
IssueLiquidity $79K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $181K (DexScreener, all pools).
FixSize any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Asset class: Project token

QA-PROFILEA token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $79K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
IssueA token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $79K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
FixCheck the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Recently launched — less than a day of market history

QA-RECENTThe token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
IssueThe token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
FixRe-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
StatusAcknowledged

Category Ratings

TechnicalMedium6/10

No Solidity source code was provided for technical analysis. Therefore, no assessment of architecture (7.1), code security (7.2), or access control (7.3) could be performed. Without code, it is impossible to identify common vulnerabilities like reentrancy, integer overflows, or logic errors.

GovernanceHigh1/10

Without access to the contract's source code, an evaluation of economic mechanisms (7.4) and governance structures (7.5) is not possible. Potential risks such as oracle manipulation, economic exploits, or centralized control cannot be assessed.

UpgradesMedium5/10

No source code was provided, preventing an assessment of upgradeability patterns (7.7) or potential upgrade safety issues. Operational aspects (7.8) and external dependencies (7.6) also remain unverified without the contract's implementation details.

Security Checklist

1/5 checks passed
Contract VerifiedFail
Ownership Renounced?
No Mint Function?
Liquidity LockedFail
Not a ProxyPass
HoneypotNoneBuy Tax0.0%Sell Tax0.0%

Holder Composition

92.6% in top 10
92.6% in wallets0.0% in contracts
Effective Concentration92.6%

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Liquidity Depth

$78.7K

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

Key Addresses

1 addresses
Deployer
0x4467…bd82

What Raised This Score

5 factors
  • Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
  • Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
  • Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool) — who holds it cannot be verified
  • Top-10 concentration > 70% (92.6% total → 92.6% effective; 92.6% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts)
  • Contract source NOT verified — its logic cannot be read

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Related Audits

6 more on the record
AXIS Robotics (AXROB)High RiskCoinbase Wrapped BTC (CBBTC)High RiskOrnn Exchange (ORNN)High RiskChipHigh RiskVision (VSN)High RiskCatena Labs (CATE)High Risk

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Agentum?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit