Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional governance and vesting features.
Read the full analysisEach factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 24, 2026
The risk score reads depth across every pair.
Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.
The owner has the authority to mint new tokens via the updateMintRate and release functions. This allows the owner to increase the total supply at their discretion, which can dilute the value of existing holdings.
Consider implementing a hard-coded supply cap or transitioning the minting authority to a decentralized governance mechanism to prevent arbitrary inflation.
Unresolved
The owner can use the lockPool and unlockPool functions to toggle a switch that controls whether token transfers are permitted. This gives the owner the power to freeze user funds or prevent trading activity.
Remove the ability to pause transfers or restrict this functionality to a time-bound emergency pause mechanism governed by a multi-sig or DAO.
Unresolved
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 10,008 holders in total.
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Acknowledged
10,008 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Acknowledged
Liquidity $110K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $147K (DexScreener, all pools).
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Acknowledged
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $110K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Acknowledged
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Acknowledged
The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional governance and vesting features. The protocol relies on a centralized owner to manage inflation and pool access. While the code follows standard OpenZeppelin patterns, the high degree of administrative control poses a significant centralization risk to token holders.
The contract utilizes well-audited OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20, Votes, and Permitting. 7.1 Architecture is modular, and 7.2 Code Security is high due to standard library usage. 7.3 Access Control is strictly enforced via Ownable, though it grants broad powers to the owner. 7.8 Operations are standard for a token contract.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance risks are elevated due to the owner's ability to mint tokens and halt transfers. The 2% annual inflation cap provides some protection, but the lack of a timelock or DAO governance makes the system highly centralized. 7.6 External dependencies are minimal and well-managed.
7.7 Upgrades are not supported as the contract is not a proxy. This ensures immutability of the logic, which is a positive security trait. No upgrade-related risks are present.
To improve security, the protocol should transition ownership to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract to mitigate the risk of a single point of failure.
Implementing a timelock on sensitive functions like updateMintRate would provide transparency and allow users to react to administrative changes.
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
The ADP 🔥 (ADP) contract on Base is 0xb05c7e6f7d00efb4043e90c7c1a640e594b0edf8. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Quantum Audit's risk score for ADP 🔥 is 73/100 (High risk) as of Oct 24, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Not verified; Ownership: Retained; Mint: Mintable; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
As of Oct 24, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 100.0% of the supply across 10,008 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page
