Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is A Gangstar Inu a Scam?

AGIBNB Chain
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Oct 27, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 9h old
SummaryAI Copilot

The contract at the provided address is not verified on the BSC block explorer.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Mint capability UNKNOWN
  • Ownership status UNKNOWN
  • LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
  • Liquidity < $50k
  • Volume/Liquidity > 15×
  • Top-10 concentration > 20%
  • Contract source not verified — its logic cannot be read
Exact factors
  • Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
  • Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
  • LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
  • Liquidity < $50k ($21,334 across 1 pairs — thin market)
  • Volume/Liquidity > 15× (22.2× — wash-trading signal)
  • Top-10 concentration > 20% (43.2% total → 22.0% effective; 7.8% in EOAs, 35.3% in contracts)
  • Contract source NOT verified — its logic cannot be read

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (9h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Oct 273 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedNot verified
OwnershipUnknown
MintUnknown
Liquidity lockUnknown
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Oct 27, 2026487 holders
35.3%Contracts7.8%56.8%Everyone else
35.3%Contracts7.8%56.8%Everyone else
ContractsWalletsEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply
43.2%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking35.3%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell7.8%
  • Everyone else477 holders56.8%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads22.0%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 27, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Oct 27$21.3K

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensUnknown

Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.

Analysed pool$21.3KShare of depth100.0%

Security Findings

1 Critical5 Info
Critical

Contract Not Verified

The contract source code is not published on the block explorer. This prevents any security analysis, logic verification, or assessment of owner privileges.C-01

Issue

The contract source code is not published on the block explorer. This prevents any security analysis, logic verification, or assessment of owner privileges.

Fix

Verify the contract source code on the block explorer to allow for public audit and transparency. If verification is not possible, the contract should be treated as untrusted.

Status

Unresolved

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 43.2% of supply. What remains: 7.8% in wallets, 35.3% in other contracts. 487 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 43.2% of supply. What remains: 7.8% in wallets, 35.3% in other contracts. 487 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

487 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

487 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $21K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $473K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $21K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $473K (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Meme token

A community token whose value comes from attention rather than a product. Being a meme is not a risk in itself: it is scored on exactly the same contract and market facts as any other token. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: meme vocabulary in name/ticker (inu). Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $21K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A community token whose value comes from attention rather than a product. Being a meme is not a risk in itself: it is scored on exactly the same contract and market facts as any other token. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: meme vocabulary in name/ticker (inu). Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $21K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.

Fix

Expect attention-driven volatility; the facts in this report say whether the contract itself can be used against holders.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — less than a day of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 27
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The contract at the provided address is not verified on the BSC block explorer. Consequently, the source code is unavailable for review, making it impossible to assess the logic, security, or safety of the contract. Investors should exercise extreme caution as unverified contracts often lack transparency and may contain malicious functions such as honeypot mechanisms or unauthorized minting capabilities.

Technical6/10Medium risk

The technical architecture cannot be evaluated due to the lack of source code. 7.1 Architecture, 7.2 Code Security, 7.3 Access Control, 7.6 External, and 7.8 Operations are all considered high-risk. Without verification, there is no assurance against backdoors or logic errors.

Governance1/10High risk

Economic parameters and governance structures are opaque. 7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance items remain unverified. Users have no visibility into tax mechanisms, supply controls, or ownership privileges.

Upgrades6/10Medium risk

The upgradeability status (7.7 Upgrades) is unknown. Without source code, it is impossible to determine if the contract is immutable or if it utilizes a proxy pattern that allows for arbitrary logic changes by the owner.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

Do not interact with this contract. The inability to verify the source code prevents any meaningful security assurance and poses a critical risk of total loss of funds.

If you are a token holder, consider the high probability of malicious intent associated with unverified smart contracts.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
Type-
NetworkBNB Chain
Token age9h
Contract0x4000…177a
Deployer0x5fd1…e7e7
Badge for your website
A Gangstar Inu security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Oct 27, 202664Medium

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of A Gangstar Inu?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified