Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Is 79AU Safe?

On-chain security analysis — is it a scam or legit?

Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page →

79AU 79AU
0xc35e…a9ca
BNB Chain
Not verifiedThis record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked today 1 audit on record
DexScreener ↗
How is this score calculated? → Medium Risk
Executive SummaryAI Copilot

This report details a security audit for the contract at 0xc35ef0564751a27b468f791113c686c8eebaa9ca on the BSC network. No source code was provided for analysis, preventing a comprehensive assessment of its functionality, security, and economic model. The lack of verified source code introduces significant risk, as users cannot independently verify the contract's intended behavior or identify potential malicious logic. All risk levels are elevated due to this fundamental lack of transparency.

1 Medium7 Informational
Volume 24h
$12.24M
Liquidity
$9.51M
Price
$5.1300
Token Age
4mo
Top 10 Holders
96.8%

Security Findings

1 Med7 Info
Medium

Liquidity not locked

QA-LIQUIDITY0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 3 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. No single one holds a majority: their exits thin the market rather than hand anyone the pool. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
Issue0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 3 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. No single one holds a majority: their exits thin the market rather than hand anyone the pool. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
FixCheck the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Lack of Source Code Verification

I-01The contract at 0xc35e…a9ca on the BSC network does not have its source code publicly verified on the blockchain explorer. This prevents any form of code review or security analysis.
IssueThe contract at on the BSC network does not have its source code publicly verified on the blockchain explorer. This prevents any form of code review or security analysis.
FixThe contract deployer should verify the source code on the blockchain explorer to provide transparency and allow for public scrutiny and security assessment.
StatusUnresolved
Info

Inability to Assess Technical Security

I-02Without access to the contract's source code, it is impossible to perform a technical security audit. This means critical vulnerabilities such as reentrancy, integer overflows, access control flaws, or logic errors cannot be identified or mitigated (7.2 Code Security, 7.3 Access Control).
IssueWithout access to the contract's source code, it is impossible to perform a technical security audit. This means critical vulnerabilities such as reentrancy, integer overflows, access control flaws, or logic errors cannot be identified or mitigated (7.2 Code Security, 7.3 Access Control).
FixProvide the full Solidity source code for comprehensive security analysis. Until then, users should assume unknown and potentially critical technical risks.
StatusUnresolved
Info

Unknown Economic and Governance Model

I-03The absence of source code prevents any assessment of the contract's economic model (7.4 Economic) or governance structure (7.5 Governance). This includes understanding tokenomics, fee mechanisms, administrative privileges, or potential for oracle manipulation or flash loan attacks.
IssueThe absence of source code prevents any assessment of the contract's economic model (7.4 Economic) or governance structure (7.5 Governance). This includes understanding tokenomics, fee mechanisms, administrative privileges, or potential for oracle manipulation or flash loan attacks.
FixPublishing the source code and providing documentation on the economic and governance design is crucial for users to understand and evaluate the associated risks.
StatusUnresolved
Info

Who holds the supply

QA-HOLDERSThe ten largest holders own 96.8% of supply. Of that, 1.2% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 0.8% in wallets, 94.8% in other contracts. 41,285 holders in total.
IssueThe ten largest holders own 96.8% of supply. Of that, 1.2% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 0.8% in wallets, 94.8% in other contracts. 41,285 holders in total.
FixWatch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Not listed by any independent source

QA-IDENTITY41,285 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Issue41,285 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
FixMatch the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

The market for this token

QA-MARKETLiquidity $9.5M (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $12.2M (DexScreener, all pools).
IssueLiquidity $9.5M (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $12.2M (DexScreener, all pools).
FixSize any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Asset class: Project token

QA-PROFILEA token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: 0% on buy, 2.99% on sell. Market: $9.5M of DEX liquidity across 4 pools. Launch: 131 days of market history.
IssueA token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: 0% on buy, 2.99% on sell. Market: $9.5M of DEX liquidity across 4 pools. Launch: 131 days of market history.
FixCheck the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
StatusAcknowledged

Category Ratings

TechnicalMedium6/10

A thorough technical assessment (7.1 Architecture, 7.2 Code Security, 7.3 Access Control) is not possible without access to the contract's source code. The absence of verified source code means that the contract's internal logic, state transitions, and interaction patterns are opaque. This prevents any analysis of common vulnerabilities such as reentrancy, integer overflows, or access control flaws, posing a high technical risk to users interacting with the contract.

GovernanceHigh3/10

Without source code, it is impossible to evaluate the economic model (7.4 Economic) or governance mechanisms (7.5 Governance) of the contract. There is no information regarding tokenomics, fee structures, or decision-making processes. Furthermore, external dependencies (7.6 External) and operational aspects (7.8 Operations) cannot be determined, leaving potential economic and governance risks entirely unknown and unmitigated.

UpgradesMedium6/10

The upgradeability status and mechanisms (7.7 Upgrades) of the contract cannot be determined without its source code. It is unknown if the contract is designed to be upgradeable, and if so, what proxy pattern (e.g., UUPS, Transparent) is used, or who controls the upgrade process. This lack of transparency introduces a high risk, as the contract's logic could potentially be altered in the future without public scrutiny.

Security Checklist

1/5 checks passed
Contract VerifiedFail
Ownership Renounced?
No Mint Function?
Liquidity LockedFail
Not a ProxyPass
HoneypotNoneBuy Tax0.0%Sell Tax3.0%

Holder Composition

96.8% in top 10
0.8% in wallets94.8% in contracts
Effective Concentration38.7%

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Liquidity Depth

$9.51M across 4 pairs
Pancakeswap v2USDTanalysed$9.51M100.0%Pancakeswap v2TestNOBUY$80.0%Pancakeswap v2CAT$60.0%Pancakeswap v2FIST$00.0%

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

LP Distribution

Top-1 Unlocked Holder46.0%
Top-3 Unlocked100.0%

Key Addresses

7 addresses
Deployer
0xe45c…40bc
Unlocked LP Held By
0x2fa1…3c8f0x3d65…4ad90x2137…d72c0xe641…32760x101a…da080xdbbe…d810

No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.

What Raised This Score

5 factors
  • Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
  • Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
  • Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool) — held by independent providers — market-depth risk
  • Top-10 concentration > 30% (96.8% total → 38.7% effective; 0.8% in EOAs, 94.8% in contracts; 1.2% burned, locked or in pools excluded)
  • Contract source NOT verified — its logic cannot be read

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Related Audits

6 more on the record
Pro Token (PRO)Medium RiskElonCoinMedium RiskSUMMERMedium RiskSomniaOFT (SOMI)Medium RiskFour (FORM)Medium RiskGoPlus Security (GPS)High Risk

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of 79AU?

Our AI-powered scanner gives you a deeper, real-time smart contract analysis — free, with every scoring factor shown.

Get Detailed Audit