The PangeaOFTV2 contract is a LayerZero-enabled Omnichain Fungible Token. The architecture follows standard OFT patterns, allowing cross-chain transfers via mint/burn mechanisms. While the contract is well-structured, it contains centralized administrative roles that can influence token supply and metadata, which requires careful key management.
Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is Zero Gap a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The PangeaOFTV2 contract is a LayerZero-enabled Omnichain Fungible Token.
Read the full analysis- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded; held by endpoint: Other-Contract, supplyreporter: Other-Contract
- Liquidity not locked
- Liquidity < $50k
Exact factors
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded; held by endpoint: Other-Contract, supplyreporter: Other-Contract
- Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool) — held by independent providers — market-depth risk
- Liquidity < $50k ($29,996 across 4 pairs — thin market)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 25Holders
as of audit · Oct 25, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking9.9%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell5.2%
- Everyone else77 holders84.9%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 25, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 25The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.
0xa6f3…e1680x6358…651bNo privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.
Security Findings
MediumCentralized Control Over Token Supply
The functions 'send', 'lzReceive', and 'reportSupply' allow privileged addresses (the LayerZero endpoint or the 'supplyReporter') to mint tokens or alter the reported supply. This grants these entities the ability to dilute existing token holders or manipulate the circulating supply.CP-01
Issue
The functions 'send', 'lzReceive', and 'reportSupply' allow privileged addresses (the LayerZero endpoint or the 'supplyReporter') to mint tokens or alter the reported supply. This grants these entities the ability to dilute existing token holders or manipulate the circulating supply.
Fix
Restrict the 'supplyReporter' role to a multi-signature wallet or a DAO-controlled contract. Ensure that all supply changes are logged and publicly verifiable to maintain trust with the community.
Status
Unresolved
MediumLiquidity not locked
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 2 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0xa6f3…e168 — holds 55.4% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY
Issue
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 2 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0xa6f3…e168 — holds 55.4% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
Fix
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 15.1% of supply. What remains: 5.2% in wallets, 9.9% in other contracts. 87 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 15.1% of supply. What remains: 5.2% in wallets, 9.9% in other contracts. 87 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
87 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
87 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $30K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $106K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $30K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $106K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $30K of DEX liquidity across 4 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $30K of DEX liquidity across 4 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 25The contract utilizes a robust LayerZero OFT implementation, ensuring standard cross-chain interoperability. 7.1 Architecture is modular and follows established patterns for cross-chain messaging. 7.2 Code Security is high, with clean logic and standard ERC-20 compliance. 7.3 Access Control is strictly enforced via modifiers, though it relies on centralized roles for supply reporting and metadata management.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance risks are centered on the 'supplyReporter' and 'metadataAuthority' roles. These roles have the power to influence token supply and metadata, which could impact market perception. 7.6 External dependencies are limited to the LayerZero endpoint, which is a trusted component of the OFT architecture.
7.7 Upgrades are not explicitly implemented via proxy patterns in this contract, reducing complexity. 7.8 Operations are straightforward, relying on standard ownership management. The lack of upgradeability ensures immutability of the core logic.
The protocol should ensure that the 'supplyReporter' and 'metadataAuthority' roles are held by multi-signature wallets or decentralized governance contracts to mitigate the risk of single-point-of-failure.
Regular monitoring of supply changes is recommended to ensure transparency for token holders. Given the centralized nature of the administrative roles, we recommend implementing a timelock for any significant changes to the contract state, particularly for roles that can influence the token supply.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 25, 202649Medium
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the ZGAP contract address?
The Zero Gap (ZGAP) contract on Ethereum is 0xdba134ad399e15d9175ce6bc97beca7001fb96ea. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Is Zero Gap a scam?
Quantum Audit's risk score for Zero Gap is 49/100 (Medium risk) as of Oct 25, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Retained; Mint: Mintable; Liquidity lock: Not locked; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Is ZGAP liquidity locked?
Liquidity lock: Not locked (as of Oct 25, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $30.0K.
Who holds ZGAP?
As of Oct 25, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 15.1% of the supply across 87 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Zero Gap?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page