The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional governance, voting, and vesting capabilities. The protocol relies on a centralized owner to manage inflation, token vesting releases, and transfer restrictions. While the code follows standard OpenZeppelin patterns, the high level of administrative control over token supply and transferability presents a significant centralization risk.
Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is XTruth Oil🔥 a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional governance, voting, and vesting capabilities.
Read the full analysis- Owner can pause all transfers
- A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
- LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
- Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
- Owner can pause all transfers
- A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
- LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
- Top-10 concentration > 30% (100.0% total → 48.2% effective; 16.2% in EOAs, 80.0% in contracts; 3.8% burned, locked or in pools excluded)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 22Holders
as of audit · Oct 22, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking80.0%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell16.2%
- Burnedout of circulation3.8%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 22, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 22The risk score reads depth across every pair.
Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.
Security Findings
MediumCentralized Control Over Token Supply
The owner has the ability to mint new tokens via the updateMintRate and release functions. This allows the owner to increase the total supply at their discretion, which can dilute the value of existing holdings.CP-01
Issue
The owner has the ability to mint new tokens via the updateMintRate and release functions. This allows the owner to increase the total supply at their discretion, which can dilute the value of existing holdings.
Fix
Implement a timelock for minting operations or move the minting authority to a decentralized governance contract.
Status
Unresolved
MediumCentralized Control Over Transferability
The owner can toggle the isPoolUnlocked switch using the lockPool and unlockPool functions. This allows the owner to arbitrarily halt or enable token transfers, effectively freezing user assets.CP-05
Issue
The owner can toggle the isPoolUnlocked switch using the lockPool and unlockPool functions. This allows the owner to arbitrarily halt or enable token transfers, effectively freezing user assets.
Fix
Remove the ability to pause transfers or restrict this functionality to a decentralized emergency pause mechanism with a clear, transparent process.
Status
Unresolved
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 3,037 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 3,037 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
3,037 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
3,037 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $75K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $145K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $75K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $145K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $75K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $75K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 22The contract utilizes well-audited OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20, voting, and permit functionality. 7.1 Architecture is modular, and 7.2 Code Security is high due to the use of standard, battle-tested components. 7.3 Access Control is strictly enforced via the Ownable pattern, ensuring only the owner can trigger sensitive functions. However, the reliance on manual state management for vesting and inflation requires careful operational oversight.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance aspects are heavily centralized. The owner has the authority to mint tokens and halt transfers, which directly impacts token holder value and liquidity. While 7.6 External dependencies are minimal, the economic model is entirely dependent on the owner's discretion regarding inflation rates and pool locking. This creates a trust-based model rather than a decentralized one.
7.7 Upgrades are not supported as the contract is not a proxy. 7.8 Operations are managed through direct owner calls. This ensures immutability of the logic but limits the ability to patch vulnerabilities or evolve the protocol without a full migration.
The protocol should consider transitioning to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance DAO to manage the privileged functions.
This would mitigate the risk of a single point of failure or malicious action by the owner. Additionally, implementing a timelock contract for all administrative functions (e.g., updateMintRate, lockPool) would provide transparency and allow the community to react to significant changes in token supply or transferability rules.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 22, 202655Medium
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the XTO contract address?
The XTruth Oil🔥 (XTO) contract on Base is 0x426b9a05ee8c0f6e61f9bc5ae562ba9761befbc9. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Is XTruth Oil🔥 a scam?
Quantum Audit's risk score for XTruth Oil🔥 is 55/100 (Medium risk) as of Oct 22, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Retained; Mint: Mintable; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Who holds XTO?
As of Oct 22, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 100.0% of the supply across 3,037 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of XTruth Oil🔥?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page