Quantum Audit Logo

Is Wired fees to socials a Scam?

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page →

Wired fees to socials WIRED
0x55db…7777
BNB Chain
Not verifiedThis record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked today 1 audit on record New Launch · 4d old
DexScreener ↗
How is this score calculated? → Low Risk
Executive SummaryAI Copilot

The FlapTaxTokenV3 contract is an ERC-20 token deployed as an EIP-1167 minimal clone. Its ownership has been renounced on-chain, rendering all `onlyOwner` functions, including those for adjusting transfer fees (`startMigration`, `finalizeMigration`), permanently inactive. This design choice significantly reduces administrative risk and ensures the immutability of the token's core parameters post-deployment. No specific vulnerabilities were identified during the audit.

7 Informational
! Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (4d old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.
Volume 24h
$720.6K
Liquidity
$113.7K
Price
$0.0009861
Token Age
4d
Top 10 Holders
21.9%

Security Findings

7 Info
Info

No issues identified in the reviewed source

I-01The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint/owner authority, mint capability, LP lock/burn state, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.
IssueThe verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint/owner authority, mint capability, LP lock/burn state, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.
FixRe-check after any contract upgrade or ownership change, both of which can alter behaviour without changing this page.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Who holds the supply

QA-HOLDERSThe ten largest holders own 21.9% of supply. Of that, 5.4% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 3.9% in wallets, 12.6% in other contracts. 1,878 holders in total.
IssueThe ten largest holders own 21.9% of supply. Of that, 5.4% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 3.9% in wallets, 12.6% in other contracts. 1,878 holders in total.
FixWatch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Not listed by any independent source

QA-IDENTITY1,878 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Issue1,878 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
FixMatch the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Liquidity burned — cannot be withdrawn

QA-LIQUIDITY100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
Issue100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
FixCheck the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

The market for this token

QA-MARKETLiquidity $114K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $721K (DexScreener, all pools).
IssueLiquidity $114K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $721K (DexScreener, all pools).
FixSize any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Asset class: Project token

QA-PROFILEA token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: nobody (ownership renounced). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $114K of DEX liquidity across 3 pools. Launch: 4 days of market history.
IssueA token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: nobody (ownership renounced). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $114K of DEX liquidity across 3 pools. Launch: 4 days of market history.
FixCheck the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Recently launched — 4 days of market history

QA-RECENTThe token's oldest DEX pool is 4 days old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
IssueThe token's oldest DEX pool is 4 days old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
FixRe-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
StatusAcknowledged

Category Ratings

TechnicalLow10/10

The contract implements the ERC-20 standard with all expected functionalities (7.1 Architecture). It is deployed as an EIP-1167 minimal clone, ensuring its logic is fixed and cannot be altered post-deployment (7.7 Upgrades). Ownership has been renounced on-chain, which means functions like `startMigration` and `finalizeMigration` that modify `poolState` are no longer callable by any external entity (7.3 Access Control). This design choice significantly enhances the contract's security posture by eliminating privileged control risks.

GovernanceLow10/10

The token's economic parameters, specifically the `poolState` which influences transfer amounts and fees, were designed to be adjustable via `startMigration` and `finalizeMigration` (7.4 Economic). However, the on-chain renouncement of ownership (7.5 Governance) has permanently disabled these functions. This means the token's economic rules are immutable, removing any potential for future manipulation or unexpected policy changes by an administrator. This fixed economic model provides predictability for token holders.

UpgradesLow10/10

The contract is deployed as an EIP-1167 minimal clone (7.1 Architecture), which inherently means its implementation is fixed and cannot be upgraded or modified after deployment (7.7 Upgrades). The use of `Initializable` and `Upgradeable` base contracts is for proper initialization within the clone's context, not for enabling future upgrades. This architecture provides strong immutability guarantees, ensuring the contract's behavior remains consistent over its lifetime.

Security Checklist

5/5 checks passed
Contract VerifiedPass
Ownership RenouncedPass
No Mint FunctionPass
Liquidity LockedPass
Not UpgradeablePass
HoneypotNoneBuy Tax0.0%Sell Tax0.0%

Holder Composition

21.9% in top 10
3.9% in wallets12.6% in contracts
Effective Concentration8.9%

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Liquidity Depth

$113.7K across 3 pairs
Pancakeswap v2WBNBanalysed$113.7K100.0%Pancakeswap v3WBNB$60.0%Pancakeswap v2中国人能飞$00.0%

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

LP Distribution

LP Burned100.0% · ≈ permanent lock
LP Locked100.0% · Null Address

Key Addresses

2 addresses
Deployer
0x6f1f…5b02
Unlocked LP Held By
0x2eb6…336b

No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.

Related Audits

6 more on the record
TCryptochicks (TCC)Low Risk币安人生Low RiskSKYAILow RiskBLow RiskDOYRLow RiskCREPELow Risk

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Wired fees to socials?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit