Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is USOE a Scam?

Base
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Oct 21, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 6h old
SummaryAI Copilot

The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional governance, voting, and vesting capabilities.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Owner can pause all transfers
  • A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
  • Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
  • Owner can pause all transfers
  • A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
  • Top-10 concentration > 30% (100.0% total → 48.2% effective; 16.2% in EOAs, 80.0% in contracts; 3.8% burned, locked or in pools excluded)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (6h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Oct 214 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipRetained
MintMintable
Liquidity lockUnknown
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Oct 21, 202624,006 holders
80.0%Contracts16.2%Wallets3.8%
80.0%Contracts16.2%Wallets3.8%
ContractsWalletsBurnedBubble area = share of supply
100.0%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking80.0%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell16.2%
  • Burnedout of circulation3.8%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads48.2%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 21, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Oct 21$4.48M

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensUnknown

Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.

Analysed pool$4.48MShare of depth100.0%

Security Findings

2 Medium5 Info
Medium

Centralized Control Over Token Supply

The owner can call updateMintRate and release to mint new tokens, which increases the total supply and dilutes existing holders. This power is unrestricted by any community vote or timelock.CP-01

Issue

The owner can call updateMintRate and release to mint new tokens, which increases the total supply and dilutes existing holders. This power is unrestricted by any community vote or timelock.

Fix

Implement a timelock for all supply-altering functions and consider moving ownership to a DAO or multi-sig to ensure community oversight.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Centralized Control Over Transferability

The owner can use lockPool and unlockPool to toggle the ability for users to transfer tokens. This allows the owner to effectively freeze assets or restrict liquidity at will.CP-05

Issue

The owner can use lockPool and unlockPool to toggle the ability for users to transfer tokens. This allows the owner to effectively freeze assets or restrict liquidity at will.

Fix

Remove the ability to arbitrarily lock transfers or restrict this functionality to specific, time-bound scenarios with clear, public criteria.

Status

Unresolved

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 24,006 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 24,006 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

24,006 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

24,006 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $4.5M (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $1.5M (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $4.5M (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $1.5M (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $4.5M of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $4.5M of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — less than a day of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 21
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional governance, voting, and vesting capabilities. The protocol relies on a centralized owner to manage minting rates and pool transfer restrictions. While the code follows established OpenZeppelin standards, the high level of administrative control over supply and transferability introduces significant centralization risks.

Technical8/10Low risk

The architecture leverages standard OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20, Votes, and EIP-712, ensuring robust base functionality. 7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security are well-implemented, utilizing modern Solidity 0.8.x features to prevent overflows. However, 7.3 Access Control is highly centralized, granting the owner full authority over token supply and transfer logic.

Governance3/10High risk

7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance aspects are dominated by the owner's ability to adjust inflation rates and lock pools. While 7.6 External dependencies are minimal, the economic model is subject to unilateral changes by the owner. This creates a trust-based environment rather than a decentralized one.

Upgrades4/10Medium risk

The contract is not upgradeable, which mitigates 7.7 Upgrades risks. 7.8 Operations are straightforward, though the reliance on the owner for critical updates remains a point of failure. No proxy patterns are utilized.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

To improve security, consider transitioning ownership to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract (DAO) to prevent single-point-of-failure risks.

Implementing a timelock on privileged functions like updateMintRate would provide transparency and allow the community to react to significant economic changes. Ensure that all administrative actions are documented and communicated to token holders. Regularly audit the vesting schedules and minting logic to ensure they remain aligned with the protocol's stated economic objectives.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeToken
NetworkBase
Token age6h
Contract0x5bf9…be07
Deployer0x8fde…0f04
Badge for your website
USOE security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Oct 21, 202658Medium

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the USOE contract address?

The USOE contract on Base is 0x5bf91d9f4d97bc09cd4af31292395a58d8b6be07. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.

Is USOE a scam?

Quantum Audit's risk score for USOE is 58/100 (Medium risk) as of Oct 21, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Retained; Mint: Mintable; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.

Who holds USOE?

As of Oct 21, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 100.0% of the supply across 24,006 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of USOE?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page