The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional governance, voting, and vesting capabilities. The protocol relies on a centralized owner to manage minting rates and pool transfer restrictions. While the code follows established OpenZeppelin standards, the high level of administrative control over supply and transferability introduces significant centralization risks.
Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is USOE a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional governance, voting, and vesting capabilities.
Read the full analysis- Owner can pause all transfers
- A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
- LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
- Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
- Owner can pause all transfers
- A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
- LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
- Top-10 concentration > 30% (100.0% total → 48.2% effective; 16.2% in EOAs, 80.0% in contracts; 3.8% burned, locked or in pools excluded)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 21Holders
as of audit · Oct 21, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking80.0%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell16.2%
- Burnedout of circulation3.8%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 21, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 21The risk score reads depth across every pair.
Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.
Security Findings
MediumCentralized Control Over Token Supply
The owner can call updateMintRate and release to mint new tokens, which increases the total supply and dilutes existing holders. This power is unrestricted by any community vote or timelock.CP-01
Issue
The owner can call updateMintRate and release to mint new tokens, which increases the total supply and dilutes existing holders. This power is unrestricted by any community vote or timelock.
Fix
Implement a timelock for all supply-altering functions and consider moving ownership to a DAO or multi-sig to ensure community oversight.
Status
Unresolved
MediumCentralized Control Over Transferability
The owner can use lockPool and unlockPool to toggle the ability for users to transfer tokens. This allows the owner to effectively freeze assets or restrict liquidity at will.CP-05
Issue
The owner can use lockPool and unlockPool to toggle the ability for users to transfer tokens. This allows the owner to effectively freeze assets or restrict liquidity at will.
Fix
Remove the ability to arbitrarily lock transfers or restrict this functionality to specific, time-bound scenarios with clear, public criteria.
Status
Unresolved
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 24,006 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 24,006 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
24,006 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
24,006 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $4.5M (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $1.5M (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $4.5M (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $1.5M (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $4.5M of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $4.5M of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 21The architecture leverages standard OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20, Votes, and EIP-712, ensuring robust base functionality. 7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security are well-implemented, utilizing modern Solidity 0.8.x features to prevent overflows. However, 7.3 Access Control is highly centralized, granting the owner full authority over token supply and transfer logic.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance aspects are dominated by the owner's ability to adjust inflation rates and lock pools. While 7.6 External dependencies are minimal, the economic model is subject to unilateral changes by the owner. This creates a trust-based environment rather than a decentralized one.
The contract is not upgradeable, which mitigates 7.7 Upgrades risks. 7.8 Operations are straightforward, though the reliance on the owner for critical updates remains a point of failure. No proxy patterns are utilized.
To improve security, consider transitioning ownership to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract (DAO) to prevent single-point-of-failure risks.
Implementing a timelock on privileged functions like updateMintRate would provide transparency and allow the community to react to significant economic changes. Ensure that all administrative actions are documented and communicated to token holders. Regularly audit the vesting schedules and minting logic to ensure they remain aligned with the protocol's stated economic objectives.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 21, 202658Medium
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the USOE contract address?
The USOE contract on Base is 0x5bf91d9f4d97bc09cd4af31292395a58d8b6be07. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Is USOE a scam?
Quantum Audit's risk score for USOE is 58/100 (Medium risk) as of Oct 21, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Retained; Mint: Mintable; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Who holds USOE?
As of Oct 21, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 100.0% of the supply across 24,006 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of USOE?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page