Is Tsuki Safe? Smart Contract Security Analysis

Security Findings

1 Info

Info

No code-level findings — an SPL mint exposes no auditable program source

I-01This token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on LP lock/burn state, holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

IssueThis token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on LP lock/burn state, holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

FixRead the risk score breakdown below as the substance of this audit. For a code-level review, the token would need an accompanying verified program.

StatusAcknowledged

Category Ratings

TechnicalLow10/10

The Tsuki token is implemented using the `spl-token` program (v3). Both the mint authority and freeze authority have been revoked, ensuring no new tokens can be minted and no existing accounts can be frozen (7.3 Access Control). The token is not balance-mutable, closable, freezable, or non-transferable, indicating standard and predictable token behavior (7.2 Code Security).

GovernanceHigh3/10

The token exhibits a healthy distribution, with the top 10 holders accounting for 23.12% of the supply, which is below common concentration thresholds (7.4 Economic). Liquidity stands at $406,057 USD, and the 24-hour volume is $147,569 USD, resulting in a normal Volume/Liquidity Ratio of 0.36. The DEX pair has been active for 847 days, providing a substantial track record (7.6 External). Holder concentration data from chain-native RPC was unavailable.

UpgradesMedium5/10

The mint authority and freeze authority are both revoked, preventing any further changes to the token's minting or freezing capabilities (7.7 Upgrades). The token is not a Token-2022 extension, and its metadata is immutable, meaning the name, symbol, or image cannot be altered post-launch. There are no upgradable features like transfer fees or transfer hooks (7.8 Operations).

Security Checklist

2/4 checks passed

Contract VerifiedPass

No Mint Function?

Liquidity LockedFail

Not a ProxyPass

HoneypotNoneBuy Tax0.0%Sell Tax0.0%

Liquidity Depth

$400.5K across 4 pairs

RaydiumSOLanalysed$400.5K Raydium CLMMSOL$43 Raydium CLMMGME$17 Meteora DYN2CSR$9

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

LP Distribution

LP Burned99.9% · ≈ permanent lock

What Raised This Score

4 factors

Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
Top-10 concentration > 20% (23.1% total → 23.1% effective; 23.1% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts — mild)
Liquidity NOT locked (owner can withdraw — rug-pull risk)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Is Tsuki Safe?