Is three.ws (THREE) Safe? Smart Contract Security Analysis

Security Findings

1 Info

Info

No code-level findings — an SPL mint exposes no auditable program source

I-01This token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

IssueThis token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

FixRead the risk score breakdown below as the substance of this audit. For a code-level review, the token would need an accompanying verified program.

StatusAcknowledged

Category Ratings

TechnicalMedium6/10

The token is an SPL Token-2022 mint, indicating it leverages the latest Solana token program features. Both the mint authority and freeze authority are revoked, meaning no new tokens can be minted and no existing accounts can be frozen. No transfer hook is active, ensuring direct token transfers without custom program execution. The default account state is not frozen, allowing immediate use of newly received tokens.

GovernanceHigh3/10

The token exhibits healthy liquidity with $182,992 USD available on DEXs. The 24-hour volume of $336,729 results in a normal Volume/Liquidity Ratio of 1.84, not indicating wash trading. The DEX pair has been active for 73 days, providing a reasonable track record. Holder concentration data was unavailable, preventing an assessment of supply distribution risk.

UpgradesMedium5/10

The mint authority and freeze authority are both revoked, preventing any further changes to the token's supply or account freeze status. The token does not utilize a transfer hook, and its metadata is immutable, ensuring the token's name, symbol, and image cannot be altered post-launch. There are no upgradable features like transfer fees or transfer hooks configured.

Security Checklist

1/4 checks passed

Contract VerifiedFail

No Mint Function?

Liquidity LockedFail

Not a ProxyPass

Liquidity Depth

$242.7K across 14 pairs

PumpswapSOLanalysed$193.5K Meteora DLMMSOL$40.1K Orca wpSOL$7.3K Meteora DYN2SOL$581 Meteora DLMMSOL$571 Meteora DYN2Circuit$235

Show 4 more pairsShow less

Meteora DLMMSOL$190 Meteora DYN2ASTY$93 Meteora DYN2CSR$29 Meteora DYN2IME$22

The 4 remaining pairs hold $34 between them and are not listed.

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

What Raised This Score

5 factors

Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
Contract source NOT verified
Top-10 concentration > 20% (24.5% total → 24.5% effective; 24.5% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts — mild)
Liquidity NOT locked (owner can withdraw — rug-pull risk)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Is three.ws Safe?

Security Findings

No code-level findings — an SPL mint exposes no auditable program source

Category Ratings

Security Checklist

Liquidity Depth

What Raised This Score

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Audits

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of three.ws?