Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
EthereumThe WrappedTest contract functions as a wrapper for a native asset.
Read the full analysisEach factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 21, 2026
The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.
The functions receiveApproval, wrap, and unwrap allow the native contract controller to mint new tokens. This grants the controller the ability to increase the total supply at will, which could lead to the dilution of existing token holders' value.
Restrict minting capabilities to a decentralized governance contract or implement a hard cap on the total supply to prevent arbitrary inflation.
Unresolved
The ten largest holders own 48.0% of supply. What remains: 19.2% in wallets, 28.8% in other contracts. 240 holders in total.
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Acknowledged
240 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Acknowledged
Liquidity $19K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $105K (DexScreener, all pools).
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Acknowledged
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $19K of DEX liquidity across 3 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Acknowledged
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Acknowledged
The WrappedTest contract functions as a wrapper for a native asset. The architecture is straightforward, utilizing standard ERC-20 transfer patterns. However, the contract lacks essential standard functions like totalSupply() and balanceOf(), which limits interoperability with standard DeFi interfaces. The primary risk involves the centralized control over token minting and supply management.
The contract implements standard transfer and transferFrom logic with proper allowance checks. 7.1 Architecture is simple but lacks standard ERC-20 view functions. 7.2 Code Security is generally sound, though 7.6 External interactions are limited to the native contract. The code is clean and follows standard Solidity patterns for token wrapping.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance risks are concentrated in the native contract controller. The ability to mint tokens via receiveApproval and wrap functions allows for potential supply inflation. There is no decentralized governance mechanism to oversee these minting operations.
7.7 Upgrades are not supported as the contract is not a proxy. This ensures the logic remains immutable post-deployment. 7.8 Operations are limited to the defined wrap/unwrap flow.
Implement the missing standard ERC-20 functions (totalSupply, balanceOf) to ensure compatibility with wallets and decentralized exchanges.
Consider adding a timelock or multi-signature requirement for the native contract controller to mitigate the risk of unauthorized minting.
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
The test contract on Ethereum is 0x867585caf0a877db3f88a2303120f8de77629eae. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Quantum Audit's risk score for test is 58/100 (Medium risk) as of Oct 21, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Mint: Mintable; Liquidity lock: Not locked; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Liquidity lock: Not locked (as of Oct 21, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $19.5K.
As of Oct 21, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 48.0% of the supply across 240 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page
