Quantum Audit Logo

Is Tesla Inc. Safe?

On-chain security analysis — is it a scam or legit?

Tesla Inc. TSLAC
0xb200…0cd0
Base
Not verifiedThis record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.
Last checked 7d ago 1 audit on record
DexScreener ↗
How is this score calculated? → Medium Risk
Executive SummaryAI Copilot

This report details a security audit for the contract at 0xb2000000000000000000001e800a7f5189430cd0 on the Base network. No source code was provided for analysis, therefore a comprehensive security assessment of the contract's logic, architecture, and potential vulnerabilities could not be performed. The findings are limited to observations based on the provided metadata and general best practices.

3 Informational
Volume 24h
$2.55M
Liquidity
$773.3K
Price
$357.3900
Token Age
1y
Top 10 Holders
0.0%

Security Findings

3 Info
Info

Source Code Not Provided for Audit

I-01The source code for the contract at 0xb200…0cd0 was not provided for this audit. This significantly limits the scope and depth of the security assessment, as direct analysis of the contract's logic, state transitions, and potential vulnerabilities is impossible. A full security review requires access to the complete, verified source code.
IssueThe source code for the contract at was not provided for this audit. This significantly limits the scope and depth of the security assessment, as direct analysis of the contract's logic, state transitions, and potential vulnerabilities is impossible. A full security review requires access to the complete, verified source code.
FixAlways provide the full, verified source code for all contracts intended for audit. This enables a thorough examination of the contract's architecture, security mechanisms, and potential attack vectors. Without source code, users and auditors must rely solely on bytecode analysis, which is less reliable and more time-consuming.
StatusUnresolved
Info

Contract Not Verified on Block Explorer

I-02The provided metadata indicates that the contract at 0xb200…0cd0 is not verified on the block explorer. Unverified contracts pose a transparency risk, as users cannot easily inspect the deployed code to confirm it matches any public claims or expected functionality. This also hinders community and auditor review.
IssueThe provided metadata indicates that the contract at is not verified on the block explorer. Unverified contracts pose a transparency risk, as users cannot easily inspect the deployed code to confirm it matches any public claims or expected functionality. This also hinders community and auditor review.
FixIt is a best practice to verify all deployed smart contracts on the respective block explorer (e.g., Etherscan, Basescan). This increases transparency, allows users to confirm the deployed code, and facilitates community scrutiny and trust. Ensure the exact compiler version and optimization settings used for deployment are provided during verification.
StatusUnresolved
Info

Lack of Public Documentation and Specifications

I-03No public documentation, whitepaper, or detailed specifications were provided alongside the contract for this audit. Comprehensive documentation is crucial for understanding the intended functionality, design choices, economic model, and security assumptions of a smart contract system. This absence makes it difficult to assess the contract against its design goals.
IssueNo public documentation, whitepaper, or detailed specifications were provided alongside the contract for this audit. Comprehensive documentation is crucial for understanding the intended functionality, design choices, economic model, and security assumptions of a smart contract system. This absence makes it difficult to assess the contract against its design goals.
FixDevelop and maintain clear, comprehensive documentation for all smart contracts. This should include a high-level overview, detailed functional specifications, architectural diagrams, threat models, and any relevant economic or governance parameters. Good documentation aids in security reviews, user adoption, and long-term maintainability.
StatusUnresolved

Category Ratings

TechnicalMedium6/10

Due to the absence of source code, a technical assessment of the contract's architecture (7.1) and code security (7.2) was not possible. No specific vulnerabilities related to reentrancy, integer overflows, or access control (7.3) could be identified. The contract's bytecode was not decompiled for this analysis.

GovernanceHigh3/10

Without source code, an evaluation of economic models (7.4) and governance mechanisms (7.5) is not feasible. Potential risks related to tokenomics, fee structures, or administrative control could not be assessed. External dependencies (7.6) and their implications also remain unknown.

UpgradesMedium5/10

The contract's upgradeability (7.7) could not be determined without access to its source code or proxy configuration. Operational aspects (7.8) such as pause mechanisms or emergency shutdowns are also unknown. The `is_proxy` field was `false`, suggesting it might not be upgradeable, but this cannot be confirmed.

Security Checklist

1/5 checks passed
Contract VerifiedFail
Ownership Renounced?
No Mint Function?
Liquidity LockedFail
Not a ProxyPass

Liquidity Depth

$777.5K across 5 pairs
AerodromeUSDCanalysed$773.3K99.5%Uniswap v4USDC$3.5K0.4%Uniswap v4ETH$5710.1%Uniswap v4USDC$1000.0%EqualizerUSDC$200.0%

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

What Raised This Score

4 factors
  • Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
  • Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
  • Contract source NOT verified
  • Liquidity NOT locked (owner can withdraw — rug-pull risk)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Related Audits

6 more on the record
Jerry the goat (JERRY)Medium RiskHunter Biden's Laptop (LAPTOP)Medium RiskSandisk Corporation (SNDKC)Medium RiskMicrosoft Corporation (MSFTC)Medium RiskBitVault Signal (BV7X)Medium RiskCoinbase Man (BRIAN)Medium Risk

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Tesla Inc.?

Our AI-powered scanner gives you a deeper, real-time smart contract analysis — free, with every scoring factor shown.

Get Detailed Audit