Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
The contract at the provided address is not verified on the Base block explorer.
Read the full analysisEach factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 31, 2026
The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.
0x28c2…2b940x9bd2…168cThe contract source code is not published on the block explorer, preventing any security analysis or verification of contract behavior.
Publish the source code on the block explorer and ensure it matches the deployed bytecode.
Unresolved
The absence of verified code obscures all administrative functions, potential backdoors, and economic logic, creating a high risk of asset loss.
Verify the contract and provide documentation for all administrative functions and economic parameters.
Unresolved
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0x28c2…2b94 — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider.
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Acknowledged
The ten largest holders own 89.7% of supply. What remains: 69.8% in wallets, 19.9% in other contracts. 1,735 holders in total.
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Acknowledged
1,735 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Acknowledged
Liquidity $78K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $109K (DexScreener, all pools).
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Acknowledged
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $78K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Acknowledged
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Acknowledged
The contract at the provided address is not verified on the Base block explorer. Consequently, the source code is unavailable for inspection, and the contract's logic, security posture, and administrative functions cannot be audited. Investors should exercise extreme caution as the lack of transparency prevents verification of ownership, tax mechanisms, or potential backdoors.
The technical architecture cannot be evaluated due to the absence of verified source code. 7.1 Architecture, 7.2 Code Security, and 7.3 Access Control are entirely opaque. Without bytecode analysis, it is impossible to determine if the contract contains malicious functions or standard security patterns. Users must assume the highest level of technical risk.
Economic parameters such as 7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance are hidden from public view. There is no way to verify if the contract includes hidden minting capabilities, transfer taxes, or blacklisting features. 7.6 External dependencies are also unknown, posing a risk of interaction with malicious or unverified protocols.
The upgradeability status (7.7 Upgrades) cannot be confirmed. If the contract is a proxy, the implementation logic is hidden, allowing for potential rug-pulls via logic updates. 7.8 Operations are entirely centralized or unknown, providing no assurance of safety for token holders.
Do not interact with this contract until the source code is verified on the block explorer and subjected to a professional security audit.
The inability to review the contract logic makes it impossible to distinguish between a legitimate project and a malicious deployment. Prioritize assets that provide transparent, verified source code and have undergone independent security assessments. Avoid providing liquidity or transferring funds to unverified addresses to prevent permanent loss of capital.
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified
