Solana · Smart Contract Security · Updated Jul 24, 2026

Is TAPE Safe? TAPE

On-chain security analysis — is it a scam or legit?

Contract 7QXDpK…pump DexScreener ↗

69 / 100

High Risk How is this score calculated? →

Volume 24h

$9.1K

Liquidity

$19.4K

Price

$0.0000604

Token Age

15d

Top 10 Holders

61.9%

Security Checklist

1/5 checks passed

Contract VerifiedFail

Ownership RenouncedUnknown

No Mint FunctionUnknown

Liquidity LockedFail

Not a ProxyPass

Audit History

2 audits on record

Jul 2369

Every audit run adds a dated snapshot — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Audit Summary

The TAPE SPL token mint exhibits strong immutability with both mint and freeze authorities revoked, and no critical or high-risk vulnerabilities were identified from available on-chain metadata and market data. Holder distribution data was unavailable, preventing a full assessment of supply concentration risk. No adverse flags were reported by a third-party risk registry.

Final Recommendation: Given the absence of identified critical or high-risk issues, holders should continue to monitor the token's market behavior and liquidity. It is advisable to periodically check for updates on holder distribution once that data becomes available, as high concentration could introduce price volatility. Verify on-chain that the mint and freeze authorities remain revoked to ensure the token's fixed supply and unfreezable nature.

Category Ratings

TechnicalMedium

6/10

The TAPE token is implemented using the spl-token-2022 program. Both the mint authority and freeze authority have been revoked, indicating a fixed supply and immutability of account freezing. No Token-2022 extensions like Transfer Hook or Default Account State Frozen are active, and external securit

GovernanceHigh

1/10

DEX market data indicates a liquidity of $32,736 and a 24-hour volume of $5,721, resulting in a normal Volume/Liquidity Ratio of 0.17. The DEX pair has been active for 40 days, providing some track record. Holder concentration data was unavailable, preventing an assessment of supply distribution. No

UpgradesMedium

5/10

The token's mint authority and freeze authority are both revoked, ensuring that no new tokens can be minted and no accounts can be frozen post-launch. The token is built on the spl-token-2022 program but does not utilize extensions like Transfer Hook or Default Account State Frozen. Furthermore

What Raised This Score

7 factors

Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
Contract source NOT verified
Top-10 concentration > 50% (61.9% total → 61.9% effective; 61.9% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts — heavy)
Liquidity NOT locked (owner can withdraw — rug-pull risk)
Liquidity < $50k ($19,425 across 2 pairs — thin market)
Token age < 30 days (still settling)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Frequently Asked Questions

Is TAPE a scam?

Based on the available data, TAPE exhibits several characteristics associated with higher-risk projects, such as an unverified contract and unlocked liquidity, which could enable adverse actions like a rug pull. However, the ownership is renounced, and no new tokens can be minted. This combination means while not definitively a scam based solely on this data, significant risks are present that investors must acknowledge.

Is TAPE safe to buy?

TAPE is not considered safe to buy without significant caution due to multiple risk factors. The unverified contract prevents code scrutiny, while unlocked liquidity exposes investors to potential withdrawal by providers. Furthermore, concentrated holdings by the top 10 wallets introduce market manipulation risks. Investors should proceed with extreme diligence and understand the implications of these identified vulnerabilities.

Has TAPE been audited?

No, TAPE's contract is explicitly listed as 'not verified.' This means the smart contract code has not been publicly provided on the blockchain explorer for review. While this isn't a formal security audit by a third-party firm, the lack of verification prevents basic community scrutiny and independent assessment of its safety and functionality.