Quantum Audit Logo

Is ‎ Silvercha‎t a Scam?

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page →

‎ Silvercha‎t SC
0x3c39…2353
Ethereum
Not verifiedThis record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked today 1 audit on record New Launch · 1d old
DexScreener ↗
How is this score calculated? → Low Risk
Executive SummaryAI Copilot

The LaunchToken contract is a standard ERC-20 token implementation. Static analysis indicates no privileged functions or custom logic that could introduce central points of control or complex vulnerabilities. The contract adheres closely to the ERC-20 standard, suggesting a low-risk profile.

1 Medium6 Informational
! Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (1d old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.
Volume 24h
$561.1K
Liquidity
$91.0K
Price
$0.0003991
Token Age
1d
Top 10 Holders
46.4%

Security Findings

1 Med6 Info
Medium

Liquidity not locked

QA-LIQUIDITY0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 2 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0xa52c…5ebb — holds 84.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
Issue0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 2 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0xa52c…5ebb — holds 84.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
FixCheck the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

No issues identified in the reviewed source

I-01The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.
IssueThe verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.
FixRe-check after any contract upgrade or ownership change, both of which can alter behaviour without changing this page.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Who holds the supply

QA-HOLDERSThe ten largest holders own 46.4% of supply. Of that, 4.3% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 8.3% in wallets, 33.8% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 5.2%. 326 holders in total.
IssueThe ten largest holders own 46.4% of supply. Of that, 4.3% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 8.3% in wallets, 33.8% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 5.2%. 326 holders in total.
FixWatch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Listed, but not independently verified

QA-IDENTITYListed on CoinGecko as SilverChat (SC). 326 holders.
IssueListed on CoinGecko as SilverChat (SC). 326 holders.
FixMatch the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

The market for this token

QA-MARKETLiquidity $95K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $303K (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $564K (DexScreener, all pools).
IssueLiquidity $95K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $303K (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $564K (DexScreener, all pools).
FixSize any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Asset class: Meme token

QA-PROFILEA community token whose value comes from attention rather than a product. Being a meme is not a risk in itself: it is scored on exactly the same contract and market facts as any other token. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: CoinGecko category: Meme. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $95K of DEX liquidity across 7 pools. Launch: 1 days of market history.
IssueA community token whose value comes from attention rather than a product. Being a meme is not a risk in itself: it is scored on exactly the same contract and market facts as any other token. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: CoinGecko category: Meme. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $95K of DEX liquidity across 7 pools. Launch: 1 days of market history.
FixExpect attention-driven volatility; the facts in this report say whether the contract itself can be used against holders.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Recently launched — 1 day of market history

QA-RECENTThe token's oldest DEX pool is 1 day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
IssueThe token's oldest DEX pool is 1 day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
FixRe-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
StatusAcknowledged

Category Ratings

TechnicalLow10/10

The contract implements the ERC-20 standard with no additional complex logic or privileged functions, which significantly reduces the attack surface (7.2 Code Security). All standard ERC-20 functions like `transfer` and `approve` are present and operate as expected. The absence of custom state-modifying functions controlled by specific addresses ensures a high degree of decentralization in its core operations (7.3 Access Control).

GovernanceHigh2/10

The contract exhibits a highly decentralized economic model as there are no privileged functions that can alter transfer conditions or token supply beyond standard ERC-20 mechanisms (7.4 Economic). This design prevents any single entity from manipulating token transfers or balances. There is no on-chain governance mechanism, which aligns with its simple token design (7.5 Governance).

UpgradesLow8/10

The contract is not implemented as a proxy and therefore is not upgradeable (7.7 Upgrades). This eliminates risks associated with upgrade mechanisms, such as proxy misconfigurations or malicious upgrade paths. Once deployed, its logic is immutable.

Security Checklist

3/5 checks passed
Contract VerifiedPass
Ownership Renounced?
No Mint FunctionPass
Liquidity LockedFail
Not a ProxyPass
HoneypotNoneBuy Tax0.0%Sell Tax0.0%

Holder Composition

46.4% in top 10
8.3% in wallets33.8% in contracts
Effective Concentration21.8%

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Liquidity Depth

$94.8K across 7 pairs
Uniswap v4ZCanalysed$91.0K96.0%Uniswap v4USDC$2.7K2.8%Uniswap v4USDC$6190.7%Uniswap v4ETH$4560.5%Uniswap v4USDC$730.1%Uniswap v4USDC$210.0%
Show 1 more pairShow less
Uniswap v4USDC$40.0%

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

LP Distribution

Top-1 Unlocked Holder84.0%
Top-3 Unlocked100.0%

Key Addresses

3 addresses
Deployer
0xb67f…8752
Unlocked LP Held By
0xa52c…5ebb0x3a9d…fa1f

What Raised This Score

2 factors
  • Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool; this pool is 96% of DEX liquidity) — who holds it cannot be verified
  • Top-10 concentration > 20% (46.4% total → 21.8% effective; 8.3% in EOAs, 33.8% in contracts; 4.3% burned, locked or in pools excluded)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Related Audits

6 more on the record
ADILow RiskTakoLow RiskRenzo (REZ)Low RiskClearpool (CPOOL)Low RiskInjective (INJ)Low RiskLighter (LIT)Low Risk

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of ‎ Silvercha‎t?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit