Is Rnld Sweginatur (RNLD) Safe? Smart Contract Security Analysis

Security Findings

1 Info

Info

No code-level findings — an SPL mint exposes no auditable program source

I-01This token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

IssueThis token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

FixRead the risk score breakdown below as the substance of this audit. For a code-level review, the token would need an accompanying verified program.

StatusAcknowledged

Category Ratings

TechnicalMedium6/10

The token is implemented using the classic `spl-token` program. Both the mint authority and freeze authority are revoked, ensuring no new tokens can be minted and no holder accounts can be frozen post-launch. The token does not utilize any Token-2022 extensions that introduce mutable features, such as balance mutability, transfer hooks, or default frozen account states, as indicated by `balance_mutable: False`, `transfer_hook_upgradable: False`, and `default_account_state_frozen: False`.

GovernanceHigh2/10

The token's economic profile shows moderate liquidity at $53,569 USD, which is not critically low. Holder concentration is also moderate, with the top 10 accounts holding 42.75% of the supply, which does not trigger high concentration warnings. The 24-hour volume of $32,428 USD results in a normal Volume/Liquidity Ratio of 0.61, and the pair has been active for 370 days, indicating an established market presence.

UpgradesMedium5/10

The token's upgradeability risk is low due to the revocation of both mint and freeze authorities. This prevents any post-launch changes to the token's supply or account freeze status. Furthermore, the token's metadata is immutable (`metadata_mutable: False`), ensuring that its name, symbol, or image cannot be altered after deployment. No Token-2022 extensions that would allow for future upgradability or modification of core token logic are present.

Security Checklist

1/4 checks passed

Contract VerifiedFail

No Mint Function?

Liquidity LockedFail

Not a ProxyPass

Liquidity Depth

$54.5K across 10 pairs

PumpswapSOLanalysed$43.3K Meteora DYN2SOL$6.4K Meteora DYN2SOL$4.3K Meteora DYN2TROLL$133 Meteora DYN2USDC$121 Meteora DYN2MET$67

Show 4 more pairsShow less

Meteora DYN2JUP$64 Meteora DYN2Bonk$31 Meteora DYN2.$13 Meteora DYN2NOOB$2

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

What Raised This Score

5 factors

Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
Contract source NOT verified
Top-10 concentration > 30% (46.0% total → 46.0% effective; 46.0% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts — moderate)
Liquidity NOT locked (owner can withdraw — rug-pull risk)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Is Rnld Sweginatur Safe?