Is RECON RACCOON (RCON) Safe? Smart Contract Security Analysis

RECON RACCOON RCON

7nZuYZ…bonk

Solana

Not verified

This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →

Last checked today 2 audits on record

DexScreener ↗

How is this score calculated? →

4 / 100

Low Risk

Executive SummaryAI Copilot

This audit of the RECON RACCOON (RCON) SPL token mint found no critical or high-risk vulnerabilities. Both the mint and freeze authorities are revoked, ensuring a fixed supply and preventing arbitrary account freezing. Liquidity is moderate, and no adverse flags were reported by third-party risk registries. Holder distribution data was unavailable, preventing a full assessment of concentration risk.

1 Informational

Volume 24h

$112.8200

Liquidity

$22.2K

Price

$0.00004012

Token Age

8mo

Top 10 Holders

78.8%

Security Findings

1 Info

Info

No code-level findings — an SPL mint exposes no auditable program source

I-01This token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on mint/owner authority, mint capability, LP lock/burn state, holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

IssueThis token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on mint/owner authority, mint capability, LP lock/burn state, holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

FixRead the risk score breakdown below as the substance of this audit. For a code-level review, the token would need an accompanying verified program.

StatusAcknowledged

Category Ratings

TechnicalLow10/10

The token is an SPL Token (v3) with the mint authority and freeze authority both revoked. This configuration prevents the creation of new tokens or the freezing of existing holder accounts by any central authority. The token does not utilize advanced Token-2022 extensions such as permanent delegates, transfer hooks, or default frozen account states, indicating a standard and immutable token behavior. (7.1 Architecture, 7.3 Access Control)

GovernanceMedium5/10

The token exhibits moderate liquidity with $47,410 USD available on DEXs, which is sufficient for small to medium trades without severe slippage. Trading activity is low with a 24-hour volume of $120, and the volume/liquidity ratio is normal (0.00), suggesting no signs of wash trading. The pair has been active for 307 days, providing a reasonable track record; however, holder concentration data was unavailable, preventing an assessment of supply distribution risk. (7.4 Economic)

UpgradesLow10/10

The token's core parameters are immutable, as both the mint and freeze authorities have been permanently revoked. This means no further tokens can be minted, and no accounts can be frozen. The token is based on the classic `spl-token` program (v3) and does not implement Token-2022 extensions that introduce mutable features like transfer fees, transfer hooks, or metadata changes, as confirmed by `transfer_fee_upgradable: False`, `transfer_hook_upgradable: False`, and `metadata_mutable: False`. (7.7 Upgrades)

Security Checklist

4/4 checks passed

Contract VerifiedPass

No Mint FunctionPass

Liquidity LockedPass

Not a ProxyPass

Liquidity Depth

$23.6K across 9 pairs

Raydium CPMMSOLanalysed$22.2K Orca wpSOL$1.4K Orca wpDOG$8 Orca wp$WIF$6 Orca wpFartcoin$5 Orca wpBonk$4

Show 3 more pairsShow less

Orca wpFapcoin$3 Orca wpUSELESS$3 Orca wpMEW$1

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

LP Distribution

LP Burned100.0% · ≈ permanent lock

LP Locked100.0% · Raydium Lock

What Raised This Score

2 factors

Top-10 concentration > 70% (78.8% total → 78.8% effective; 78.8% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts — extreme)
Liquidity < $50k ($23,619 across 9 pairs — thin market)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Not Signed In

Is RECON RACCOON Safe?