Is パンチ (PUNCH) Safe? Smart Contract Security Analysis

Security Findings

1 Info

Info

No code-level findings — an SPL mint exposes no auditable program source

I-01This token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

IssueThis token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

FixRead the risk score breakdown below as the substance of this audit. For a code-level review, the token would need an accompanying verified program.

StatusAcknowledged

Category Ratings

TechnicalMedium6/10

The パンチ (Punch) token is an SPL Token-2022 mint. Both the mint authority and freeze authority have been revoked, ensuring no new tokens can be created and no existing accounts can be frozen. The token does not utilize a transfer hook, nor is the default account state frozen, which simplifies transfers and account management. (7.1 Architecture, 7.3 Access Control)

GovernanceHigh2/10

The token exhibits healthy DEX liquidity at $225,462 USD, with a normal 24-hour volume to liquidity ratio of 0.54. The DEX pair has been active for 167 days, providing a reasonable track record. Holder concentration is low, with the top 10 accounts holding 31.39% of the supply, reducing the risk of large-scale sell-offs. (7.4 Economic)

UpgradesMedium5/10

The mint authority and freeze authority are both revoked, meaning the token's supply and account freezing capabilities are immutable. No mutable metadata or upgradable transfer fee/hook extensions are present, indicating a fixed configuration for the token's core properties. (7.7 Upgrades)

Security Checklist

1/4 checks passed

Contract VerifiedFail

No Mint Function?

Liquidity LockedFail

Not a ProxyPass

Liquidity Depth

$210.6K across 7 pairs

PumpswapSOLanalysed$209.3K Meteora DLMMSOL$1.2K Meteora DYN2RNLD$10 Meteora DYN2SOL$5 Meteora DYN2PEPE$4 Meteora DYN2USDC$2

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

What Raised This Score

5 factors

Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
Contract source NOT verified
Top-10 concentration > 30% (39.2% total → 39.2% effective; 39.2% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts — moderate)
Liquidity NOT locked (owner can withdraw — rug-pull risk)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Is パンチ Safe?