Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional governance, voting, and vesting capabilities.
Read the full analysisEach factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 21, 2026
The risk score reads depth across every pair.
Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.
The owner can call updateMintRate and release to mint new tokens, increasing the total supply and potentially diluting existing holders.
Implement a timelock for minting operations or transition ownership to a DAO to ensure community oversight of supply changes.
Unresolved
The owner can call lockPool and unlockPool to enable or disable token transfers, effectively freezing user assets at will.
Remove the ability to arbitrarily lock transfers or restrict this functionality to emergency scenarios managed by a decentralized governance body.
Unresolved
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 3,068 holders in total.
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Acknowledged
3,068 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Acknowledged
Liquidity $235K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $609K (DexScreener, all pools).
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Acknowledged
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $235K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Acknowledged
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Acknowledged
The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional governance, voting, and vesting capabilities. The protocol relies on a centralized owner to manage inflation, token vesting, and transfer restrictions. While the code follows standard OpenZeppelin patterns, the high level of administrative control over supply and transferability introduces significant trust requirements for token holders.
The architecture utilizes robust, battle-tested OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20, voting, and permit functionality. 7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security are well-implemented, adhering to standard patterns. 7.3 Access Control is strictly enforced via Ownable, though the scope of administrative power is broad. 7.8 Operations are standard, with no complex logic that would introduce overflow or reentrancy risks.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance aspects are heavily centralized. The owner has the authority to mint tokens up to a 2% annual cap and control transferability via the lockPool mechanism. This creates a dependency on the owner's integrity, as they can unilaterally dilute holders or halt market activity. 7.6 External dependencies are minimal and well-managed.
The contract is not a proxy and does not support 7.7 Upgrades. The logic is immutable once deployed, which provides certainty to users regarding the contract's behavior. No upgradeability risks are present.
The protocol should consider transitioning ownership to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract to mitigate the risks associated with a single point of failure.
Implementing a timelock on sensitive functions like updateMintRate would provide transparency and allow the community to react to significant changes in token supply. Users should be aware that the contract owner retains the ability to pause transfers and mint new tokens. We recommend that the project team publishes documentation detailing the intended use of the lockPool and minting functions to build trust with the community.
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page
