The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional governance, voting, and vesting capabilities. The protocol relies on a centralized owner to manage inflation, vesting releases, and pool transfer restrictions. While the code follows standard OpenZeppelin patterns, the high level of administrative control over token supply and transferability introduces significant trust requirements for users.
Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is NAFF a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional governance, voting, and vesting capabilities.
Read the full analysis- Owner can pause all transfers
- A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
- LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
- Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
- Owner can pause all transfers
- A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
- LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
- Top-10 concentration > 30% (95.5% total → 38.5% effective; 0.5% in EOAs, 94.9% in contracts)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 31Holders
as of audit · Oct 31, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking94.9%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell0.5%
- Everyone else146 holders4.5%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 31, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 31The risk score reads depth across every pair.
Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.
Security Findings
MediumCentralized Control Over Token Supply
The owner has the ability to mint new tokens via the updateMintRate and release functions. This allows the owner to increase the total supply, which dilutes the value of existing holdings.CP-01
Issue
The owner has the ability to mint new tokens via the updateMintRate and release functions. This allows the owner to increase the total supply, which dilutes the value of existing holdings.
Fix
Transition ownership to a multi-signature wallet or a DAO to ensure that minting actions require community consensus.
Status
Unresolved
MediumCentralized Control Over Transferability
The owner can use the lockPool and unlockPool functions to enable or disable transfers for specific pools. This gives the owner the power to effectively freeze user assets or prevent trading at their discretion.CP-05
Issue
The owner can use the lockPool and unlockPool functions to enable or disable transfers for specific pools. This gives the owner the power to effectively freeze user assets or prevent trading at their discretion.
Fix
Remove the ability to arbitrarily lock pools or implement a timelock so that any changes to transferability are transparent and predictable.
Status
Unresolved
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 95.5% of supply. What remains: 0.5% in wallets, 94.9% in other contracts. 156 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 95.5% of supply. What remains: 0.5% in wallets, 94.9% in other contracts. 156 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
156 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
156 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $29.3M (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $875K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $29.3M (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $875K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $29.3M of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $29.3M of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 31The contract utilizes well-audited OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20, voting, and permit functionality. 7.1 Architecture is modular, and 7.2 Code Security is high due to the use of standard, battle-tested primitives. 7.3 Access Control is strictly enforced via Ownable, though it centralizes power. 7.6 External dependencies are minimal and standard, ensuring predictable behavior.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance aspects are heavily centralized. The owner has the authority to mint tokens and restrict transfers, which directly impacts 7.8 Operations. While inflation is capped at 2% annually, the ability to trigger minting and lock pools creates a dependency on the owner's actions. Users should be aware that their ability to move tokens is subject to administrative policy.
The contract is not a proxy and does not support 7.7 Upgrades. The logic is immutable once deployed, which provides security against malicious logic changes. However, this also means that any discovered bugs cannot be patched without a migration to a new contract.
To improve security and trust, consider transitioning the ownership to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract (DAO).
This would mitigate the risk of a single point of failure regarding the minting and pool-locking functions.
Additionally, implement a timelock mechanism for all privileged functions. A delay of 24-48 hours on administrative actions like updateMintRate or lockPool would provide transparency and allow the community to react to significant changes in tokenomics or transfer rules.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 31, 202655Medium
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the NAFF contract address?
The NAFF contract on Base is 0x0527b091cb91167638683c5bf3e20134ad2f622f. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Is NAFF a scam?
Quantum Audit's risk score for NAFF is 55/100 (Medium risk) as of Oct 31, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Retained; Mint: Mintable; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Who holds NAFF?
As of Oct 31, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 95.5% of the supply across 156 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of NAFF?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified