Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is MAMESUKE a Scam?

Ethereum
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Nov 3, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 3h old
SummaryAI Copilot

The MAMESUKE token is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional custom logic.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Liquidity < $50k
  • Top-10 concentration > 30%
  • Code: Non-Compliant Transfer Return Values
  • Code: Insecure Use of tx.origin for Authorization
Exact factors
  • Liquidity < $50k ($43,007 across 1 pairs — thin market)
  • Top-10 concentration > 30% (36.2% total → 30.4% effective; 26.6% in EOAs, 9.6% in contracts)
  • Code: Non-Compliant Transfer Return Values (High, static analysis)
  • Code: Insecure Use of tx.origin for Authorization (Medium, static analysis)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (3h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Nov 36 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipUnknown
MintNo mint
Liquidity lockLocked
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Nov 3, 2026164 holders
9.6%Contracts26.6%Wallets63.8%Everyone else
9.6%26.6%Wallets63.8%Everyone else
ContractsWalletsEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply
36.2%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking9.6%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell26.6%
  • Everyone else154 holders63.8%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads30.4%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Nov 3, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Nov 3$43.0K

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensLocked

The LP tokens of the analysed pool are locked or burned.

Analysed pool$43.0KShare of depth100.0%
LP Burned100.0% · ≈ permanent lock
LP Locked100.0% · Dead Address

Security Findings

1 High1 Medium6 Info
High

Non-Compliant Transfer Return Values

The transfer and transferFrom functions do not correctly handle return values, which can cause external protocols (like DEXs or lending platforms) to fail or misinterpret the success of a transaction.CD-01

Issue

The transfer and transferFrom functions do not correctly handle return values, which can cause external protocols (like DEXs or lending platforms) to fail or misinterpret the success of a transaction.

Fix

Ensure that all transfer functions explicitly return a boolean 'true' upon successful execution and revert on failure, adhering strictly to the ERC-20 specification.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Insecure Use of tx.origin for Authorization

The use of tx.origin in the returnTx function allows an attacker to trick a user into interacting with a malicious contract, which can then perform actions on behalf of the user by bypassing standard msg.sender checks.CD-02

Issue

The use of tx.origin in the returnTx function allows an attacker to trick a user into interacting with a malicious contract, which can then perform actions on behalf of the user by bypassing standard msg.sender checks.

Fix

Replace all occurrences of tx.origin with msg.sender to ensure that authorization is tied to the immediate caller, preventing unauthorized contract-based interactions.

Status

Unresolved

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 36.2% of supply. What remains: 26.6% in wallets, 9.6% in other contracts. 164 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 36.2% of supply. What remains: 26.6% in wallets, 9.6% in other contracts. 164 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

164 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

164 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Liquidity burned — cannot be withdrawn

100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY

Issue

100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.

Fix

Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $43K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $260K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $43K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $260K (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $43K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $43K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — less than a day of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Nov 3
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The MAMESUKE token is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional custom logic. The audit identified critical flaws in the return value handling of transfer functions and insecure usage of tx.origin for authorization logic. While the contract follows standard ERC-20 patterns, these specific implementation choices introduce significant risks to integration with external protocols and potential security bypasses.

Technical8/10Low risk

The contract architecture relies on standard OpenZeppelin-like ERC-20 patterns for core functionality. 7.1 Architecture is straightforward, but 7.2 Code Security is compromised by non-standard return behaviors in transfer functions. 7.3 Access Control is weakened by the reliance on tx.origin, which is susceptible to phishing-style attacks. 7.6 External integrations will likely fail due to the incorrect return values.

Governance7/10Low risk

7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance aspects are minimal as the contract lacks administrative functions or complex economic parameters. There are no minting or burning mechanisms that could impact token supply. The token operates as a simple transfer-based asset.

Upgrades8/10Low risk

7.7 Upgrades are not applicable as the contract is not a proxy and lacks upgradeability patterns. The code is immutable. 7.8 Operations are limited to standard token transfers.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

The contract must be updated to ensure that transfer and transferFrom functions strictly adhere to the ERC-20 standard by returning a boolean value that accurately reflects the success of the operation.

Additionally, all instances of tx.origin must be replaced with msg.sender to prevent unauthorized access and potential manipulation by malicious intermediary contracts. Developers should perform a thorough refactor of the transfer path to ensure compatibility with DeFi protocols that rely on standard ERC-20 return values. Post-fix, a comprehensive suite of unit tests should be implemented to verify standard compliance and access control integrity.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeToken
NetworkEthereum
Token age3h
Contract0x158c…c45f
Deployer0xae7b…8002
Badge for your website
MAMESUKE security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Nov 3, 202656Medium

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the MAMESUKE contract address?

The MAMESUKE contract on Ethereum is 0x158c9abd9d104c60cabf9870fbe92f3b30a0c45f. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.

Is MAMESUKE a scam?

Quantum Audit's risk score for MAMESUKE is 56/100 (Medium risk) as of Nov 3, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Mint: No mint; Liquidity lock: Locked; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.

Is MAMESUKE liquidity locked?

Liquidity lock: Locked (as of Nov 3, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $43.0K.

Who holds MAMESUKE?

As of Nov 3, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 36.2% of the supply across 164 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of MAMESUKE?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified