Solana · Smart Contract Security · Updated Jul 24, 2026

Is Kintara Safe? KINS

On-chain security analysis — is it a scam or legit?

Contract Tqj8yF…pump DexScreener ↗

40 / 100

Medium Risk How is this score calculated? →

Volume 24h

$222.8K

Liquidity

$258.0K

Price

$0.004025

Token Age

20d

Top 10 Holders

18.7%

Security Checklist

1/5 checks passed

Contract VerifiedFail

Ownership RenouncedUnknown

No Mint FunctionUnknown

Liquidity LockedFail

Not a ProxyPass

Audit History

2 audits on record

Jul 2340

Every audit run adds a dated snapshot — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Audit Summary

The Kintara (KINS) SPL Token Mint exhibits a robust security configuration with both mint and freeze authorities revoked, indicating a fixed supply and immutable account states. No critical or high-severity risks were identified based on the available on-chain data and external security signals. Holder distribution data was unavailable, preventing an assessment of supply concentration.

Final Recommendation: Holders should verify on-chain that the mint and freeze authorities remain revoked to ensure the token's supply and transferability are fixed. While current liquidity is adequate, monitor DEX liquidity and trading volume for any significant changes that could impact market depth. Future assessments should prioritize obtaining holder distribution data to evaluate potential concentration risks.

Category Ratings

TechnicalMedium

6/10

The Kintara (KINS) token is implemented using the spl-token-2022 program. Both the mint authority and freeze authority have been revoked, ensuring no new tokens can be minted and no existing accounts can be frozen. No Token-2022 extensions such as a transfer hook or permanent delegate are active, an

GovernanceHigh

3/10

The token exhibits healthy liquidity with $361,778 in total DEX liquidity and a 24-hour volume of $851,514. The Volume/Liquidity Ratio is 2.35, which is within normal parameters and does not suggest wash trading. The DEX pair has been active for 49 days, providing a reasonable track record. Holder c

UpgradesMedium

5/10

The token's mint and freeze authorities are revoked, preventing any future changes to supply or account freeze status. External security signals confirm that balance mutability, transfer fee upgradability, transfer hook upgradability, and metadata mutability are all disabled. This indicates a h

What Raised This Score

5 factors

Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
Contract source NOT verified
Liquidity NOT locked (owner can withdraw — rug-pull risk)
Token age < 30 days (still settling)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Kintara a scam?

Based on the provided data, Kintara exhibits both positive and concerning signals. The ownership is renounced and there's no mint function, which reduces certain scam vectors like infinite token creation or malicious contract changes. However, the contract remains unverified, preventing full transparency, and liquidity is not locked, posing potential risks for investors. These factors contribute to a medium risk score.

Is Kintara safe to buy?

Investing in Kintara carries medium risk. Key concerns include the unverified contract, meaning its code cannot be publicly audited for safety or integrity. Additionally, the lack of locked liquidity presents a risk of sudden withdrawals, potentially impacting the token's stability and your ability to sell. While ownership is renounced and no new tokens can be minted, these risks warrant careful consideration before investing.

Has Kintara been audited?

The provided data indicates that the Kintara contract is *not* verified. This means its source code has not been publicly published and matched against the deployed contract on the blockchain. Without verification, a formal audit by an independent security firm, which typically requires access to verified code, cannot be conclusively confirmed or its findings evaluated.