Is HODL Safe? Smart Contract Security Analysis

Security Findings

1 Info

Info

No code-level findings — an SPL mint exposes no auditable program source

I-01This token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

IssueThis token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

FixRead the risk score breakdown below as the substance of this audit. For a code-level review, the token would need an accompanying verified program.

StatusAcknowledged

Category Ratings

TechnicalLow10/10

The HODL token is implemented using the spl-token-2022 program. Both the mint authority and freeze authority have been revoked, ensuring no new tokens can be minted and no existing accounts can be frozen. No transfer hook is active, meaning transfers are not subject to custom on-chain program logic.

GovernanceHigh3/10

The token exhibits healthy liquidity at $286,560 USD, with a normal 24-hour volume to liquidity ratio of 1.84. The pair has been active for 205 days, providing a reasonable track record. Top 10 token accounts hold 27.96% of the supply, indicating a relatively distributed holder base below common concentration thresholds. Full holder distribution data was unavailable for a complete assessment.

UpgradesMedium5/10

The token's core authorities, Mint Authority and Freeze Authority, are permanently revoked, preventing further issuance or account freezing. Metadata, including name and symbol, is immutable, ensuring branding consistency post-launch. Other extensions like transfer fees and transfer hooks are not present or are not upgradable, indicating a fixed token configuration.

Security Checklist

2/4 checks passed

Contract VerifiedPass

No Mint Function?

Liquidity LockedFail

Not a ProxyPass

HoneypotNoneBuy Tax0.0%Sell Tax0.0%

Liquidity Depth

$302.9K across 9 pairs

PumpswapSOLanalysed$287.5K Meteora DLMMSOL$9.4K Meteora DYN2SOL$5.3K Meteora DLMMSOL$221 Meteora DYN2USDC$217 Meteora DYN2VCF$213

Show 2 more pairsShow less

Meteora DYN2ANSEM$9 Meteora DYN2SOL$5

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

What Raised This Score

4 factors

Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
Top-10 concentration > 20% (28.0% total → 28.0% effective; 28.0% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts — mild)
Liquidity NOT locked (owner can withdraw — rug-pull risk)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Is HODL Safe?