The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional governance, voting, and vesting capabilities. The protocol relies on a centralized owner to manage inflation, pool locking, and vesting releases. While the code follows standard OpenZeppelin patterns, the high degree of administrative control over token supply and transferability presents a significant centralization risk to token holders.
Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is GOIF a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional governance, voting, and vesting capabilities.
Read the full analysis- Owner can pause all transfers
- A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
- Liquidity not locked
- Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
- Owner can pause all transfers
- A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
- Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool) — who holds it cannot be verified
- Top-10 concentration > 30% (100.0% total → 48.3% effective; 16.2% in EOAs, 80.0% in contracts; 3.7% burned, locked or in pools excluded)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 21Holders
as of audit · Oct 21, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking80.0%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell16.2%
- Burnedout of circulation3.7%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 21, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 21The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.
Security Findings
MediumCentralized Minting Authority
The owner has the authority to increase the total supply of the token via the updateMintRate and release functions. This allows the owner to dilute the holdings of all existing token holders at their discretion.CP-01
Issue
The owner has the authority to increase the total supply of the token via the updateMintRate and release functions. This allows the owner to dilute the holdings of all existing token holders at their discretion.
Fix
Implement a multi-signature wallet for the owner address or transition to a decentralized governance model to require community consensus for minting events.
Status
Unresolved
MediumCentralized Control Over Token Transfers
The owner can use the lockPool and unlockPool functions to toggle a switch that controls whether transfers are permitted. This gives the owner the power to effectively freeze user assets or halt trading at any time.CP-05
Issue
The owner can use the lockPool and unlockPool functions to toggle a switch that controls whether transfers are permitted. This gives the owner the power to effectively freeze user assets or halt trading at any time.
Fix
Remove the ability for the owner to arbitrarily lock transfers, or implement a timelock and public notification period before such drastic changes to token utility can be enacted.
Status
Unresolved
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.7% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 4,009 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.7% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 4,009 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
4,009 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
4,009 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $51K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $136K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $51K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $136K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $51K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $51K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 21The contract utilizes well-audited OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20, EIP-712, and governance features. 7.1 Architecture is modular, and 7.2 Code Security is high due to the use of standard, battle-tested primitives. 7.3 Access Control is strictly enforced via Ownable, though it grants extensive power to the owner. 7.6 External dependencies are minimal and standard.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance aspects are heavily centralized. The owner has the ability to mint tokens and halt transfers, which directly impacts the economic value and liquidity of the token. While inflation is capped at 2% annually, the lack of a timelock or decentralized governance mechanism for these actions is a notable concern.
7.7 Upgrades are not supported as the contract is not a proxy. 7.8 Operations are straightforward, relying on the owner to trigger vesting releases and manage pool states. The lack of upgradeability ensures immutability but prevents future logic adjustments without a migration.
To improve security and trust, consider transitioning the owner role to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized DAO governance contract.
This would mitigate the risk of a single compromised key performing unauthorized minting or locking of user funds. Additionally, implementing a timelock for sensitive administrative functions like updateMintRate would provide transparency and allow the community to react to significant changes in tokenomics before they take effect.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 21, 202662Medium
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of GOIF?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page