The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with integrated governance and vesting features. While the code follows established OpenZeppelin standards, it grants significant centralized control to the owner, including the ability to mint tokens and halt transfers. The protocol exhibits strong architectural foundations but requires caution regarding the high level of administrative privilege.
Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is Federal Private Equity System a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with integrated governance and vesting features.
Read the full analysis- Owner can pause all transfers
- A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
- LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
- Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
- Owner can pause all transfers
- A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
- LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
- Top-10 concentration > 30% (100.0% total → 48.3% effective; 16.3% in EOAs, 80.0% in contracts; 3.7% burned, locked or in pools excluded)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 21Holders
as of audit · Oct 21, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking80.0%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell16.3%
- Burnedout of circulation3.7%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 21, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 21The risk score reads depth across every pair.
Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.
Security Findings
MediumCentralized Minting Authority
The owner has the ability to call updateMintRate and release, which can increase the total supply of the token. This allows the owner to dilute the holdings of existing token holders at their discretion.CP-01
Issue
The owner has the ability to call updateMintRate and release, which can increase the total supply of the token. This allows the owner to dilute the holdings of existing token holders at their discretion.
Fix
Restrict the minting capability by implementing a hard cap on the total supply or requiring a governance vote for any minting operations.
Status
Unresolved
MediumCentralized Transfer Control
The owner can use the lockPool and unlockPool functions to enable or disable token transfers. This grants the owner the power to effectively freeze user assets or restrict liquidity at will.CP-05
Issue
The owner can use the lockPool and unlockPool functions to enable or disable token transfers. This grants the owner the power to effectively freeze user assets or restrict liquidity at will.
Fix
Remove the ability for the owner to arbitrarily lock transfers, or implement a decentralized mechanism that requires community consensus to trigger such restrictions.
Status
Unresolved
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.7% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.3% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.3%. 2,007 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.7% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.3% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.3%. 2,007 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
2,007 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
2,007 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $52K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $117K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $52K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $117K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $52K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $52K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 21The contract utilizes standard, battle-tested OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20, Votes, and Permit functionality. 7.1 Architecture is modular, and 7.2 Code Security is high due to the use of audited base contracts. 7.3 Access Control is implemented via Ownable, though it creates a single point of failure. 7.6 External dependencies are limited to standard libraries, minimizing integration risks.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance aspects are heavily centralized under the owner. The owner has the authority to mint tokens and modify transfer rules, which directly impacts token holder value. While 7.8 Operations are transparent, the lack of a timelock or multi-signature requirement for these functions poses a risk to decentralization.
7.7 Upgrades are not applicable as the contract is not a proxy. The logic is immutable, which provides security against logic-swap attacks. However, this also means that any identified bugs cannot be patched without a migration to a new contract.
It is recommended to transition the ownership of the contract to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract to mitigate the risks associated with centralized control.
Implementing a timelock on sensitive functions like updateMintRate and lockPool would provide token holders with sufficient notice before significant changes to the protocol's economic state occur.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 21, 202655Medium
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the FPES contract address?
The Federal Private Equity System (FPES) contract on Base is 0x60d9930ece50b27acae00bef80baccc6bcf1fd90. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Is Federal Private Equity System a scam?
Quantum Audit's risk score for Federal Private Equity System is 55/100 (Medium risk) as of Oct 21, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Retained; Mint: Mintable; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Who holds FPES?
As of Oct 21, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 100.0% of the supply across 2,007 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Federal Private Equity System?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page