Is EMBER a Scam? New Token Security Check

EMBER EMBER

7RHxQQ…pump

Solana Not verifiedLast checked 3d ago 1 audit on record New Launch · 4d old

DexScreener ↗

86 / 100

Critical Risk

Executive SummaryAI Copilot

The EMBER SPL Token Mint (7RHxQQUWG9fCskqocSV9zPkWPLJqcceWTcUCjnwMpump) exhibits strong security configurations with both mint and freeze authorities revoked, preventing further token issuance or account freezing. No transfer hooks or default frozen states are active. However, critical data regarding holder concentration and DEX liquidity is unavailable, and a third-party risk registry flags low liquidity, indicating potential trading challenges. This audit is based solely on on-chain metadata and third-party registry data; no source code was analyzed.

1 Informational

! Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (4d old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Volume 24h

$7.6700

Liquidity

$4.2K

Price

$0.000003015

Token Age

Top 10 Holders

95.7%

Security Findings

1 Info

Info

No code-level findings — an SPL mint exposes no auditable program source

I-01This token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

IssueThis token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

FixRead the risk score breakdown below as the substance of this audit. For a code-level review, the token would need an accompanying verified program.

StatusAcknowledged

Category Ratings

TechnicalMedium4/10

The EMBER token is implemented using the spl-token-2022 program. Key administrative authorities, including the Mint Authority and Freeze Authority, have been permanently revoked, preventing further token minting or freezing of holder accounts. The token does not utilize a Transfer Hook, nor is the Default Account State Frozen. Furthermore, the token is configured with `balance_mutable: False`, `closable: False`, `freezable: False`, `non_transferable: False`, and `metadata_mutable: False`, indicating a fixed and immutable token configuration post-launch.

GovernanceHigh1/10

Assessment of the token's economic stability is limited due to unavailable DEX market data and holder concentration information. A third-party risk registry indicates 'Low Liquidity', suggesting potential difficulties for significant trading activity. Without data on top holder distribution, the risk of whale-induced price volatility cannot be assessed.

UpgradesMedium4/10

The token's configuration is highly immutable, with both Mint Authority and Freeze Authority permanently revoked. Key Token-2022 extensions such as transfer hooks and transfer fees are not active, and their upgradability flags (`transfer_hook_upgradable`, `transfer_fee_upgradable`) are set to `False`. Additionally, the token's metadata is immutable (`metadata_mutable: False`), ensuring that its name, symbol, and image cannot be altered post-deployment.

Security Checklist

1/4 checks passed

Contract VerifiedFail

No Mint Function?

Liquidity LockedFail

Not a ProxyPass

Liquidity Depth

$4.2K

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

What Raised This Score

7 factors

Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
Contract source NOT verified
Top-10 concentration > 70% (95.7% total → 95.7% effective; 95.7% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts — extreme)
Liquidity NOT locked (owner can withdraw — rug-pull risk)
Liquidity < $10k ($4,174 across 1 pairs — easily drained)
Token age < 7 days (early, volatile)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Frequently Asked Questions

Is EMBER a scam?

Based on the available data, EMBER exhibits mixed signals. The renounced ownership and absence of a mint function are positive indicators that reduce common scam vectors. However, the unverified contract and unlocked liquidity present significant transparency and potential rug pull risks, respectively. While these factors do not definitively label it a "scam," they are critical concerns that warrant extreme caution and thorough due diligence from any potential investor.

Is EMBER safe to buy?

EMBER's safety profile is impacted by several key risk factors. The contract's unverified status prevents public scrutiny of its code, and the liquidity not being locked introduces vulnerability to withdrawal, which could destabilize trading. Additionally, a substantial portion of the supply is concentrated among the top 10 holders, posing centralization risks. These elements contribute to its Medium Risk score of 45/100, suggesting investors should proceed with significant caution and understand the inherent uncertainties.

Has EMBER been audited?

The provided data indicates that EMBER's contract is currently unverified. This means its source code has not been publicly published or confirmed to match the deployed bytecode on the blockchain. It's important to note that an unverified contract is distinct from a formal security audit conducted by an independent firm. Without verification, independent security analysis is severely hampered, making it difficult to assess the contract's true functionality or identify potential vulnerabilities.

Is EMBER a Scam?

Security Findings

No code-level findings — an SPL mint exposes no auditable program source

Category Ratings

Security Checklist

Liquidity Depth

What Raised This Score

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Audits

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of EMBER?