The DYPE contract is a standard ERC-20 token implementation utilizing OpenZeppelin's ERC20Permit extension. The codebase follows established industry standards and contains no privileged administrative functions or complex logic that could lead to centralization risks or unexpected state changes. No vulnerabilities were identified during the static analysis of the transfer path or state management.
Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is DYPE a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The DYPE contract is a standard ERC-20 token implementation utilizing OpenZeppelin's ERC20Permit extension.
Read the full analysis- Liquidity not locked
- Liquidity < $50k
- Top-10 concentration > 70%
Exact factors
- Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool) — held by independent providers — market-depth risk
- Liquidity < $50k ($34,637 across 1 pairs — thin market)
- Top-10 concentration > 70% (100.0% total → 100.0% effective; 100.0% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts; deployer/owner holds 99.0%)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Nov 8Holders
as of audit · Nov 8, 2026- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell100.0%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Nov 8, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Nov 8The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.
0x4708…07f5No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.
Security Findings
HighWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. What remains: 100.0% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 99.0%. A holder that also controls the contract can sell into its own liquidity. 78 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. What remains: 100.0% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 99.0%. A holder that also controls the contract can sell into its own liquidity. 78 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
MediumLiquidity not locked
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0x4708…07f5 — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY
Issue
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0x4708…07f5 — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
Fix
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNo issues identified in the reviewed source
The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.I-01
Issue
The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.
Fix
Re-check after any contract upgrade or ownership change, both of which can alter behaviour without changing this page.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
78 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
78 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $35K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $49K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $35K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $49K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $35K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: 2 days of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $35K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: 2 days of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — 2 days of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is 2 days old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is 2 days old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Nov 8The architecture strictly adheres to the ERC-20 and EIP-2612 standards, ensuring high interoperability with DeFi protocols. 7.1 Architecture is robust, 7.2 Code Security is high due to the use of audited OpenZeppelin libraries, and 7.3 Access Control is non-existent as the contract is immutable. 7.6 External dependencies are limited to standard library imports, minimizing the attack surface.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance factors are not applicable as the token lacks minting, burning, or administrative control functions. The supply is fixed at deployment, and there are no mechanisms for fee collection or blacklisting. 7.8 Operations are straightforward, relying entirely on standard token transfers.
7.7 Upgrades are not supported as the contract is not a proxy. The implementation is immutable, providing long-term security for token holders against logic changes. No upgradeability risks exist.
The DYPE contract is well-structured and follows secure coding standards.
No further action is required as the contract is immutable and lacks complex logic that could be exploited. Users should ensure they interact only with the verified contract address provided. As with any token, exercise caution when interacting with third-party liquidity pools or protocols that utilize this token.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Nov 8, 202656Medium
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the DYPE contract address?
The DYPE contract on Ethereum is 0x4a8360633e3a04346bf2cfc1fe371293fbd4a836. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Is DYPE a scam?
Quantum Audit's risk score for DYPE is 56/100 (Medium risk) as of Nov 8, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Mint: No mint; Liquidity lock: Not locked; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Is DYPE liquidity locked?
Liquidity lock: Not locked (as of Nov 8, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $34.6K.
Who holds DYPE?
As of Nov 8, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 100.0% of the supply across 78 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of DYPE?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified