Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is Digital Oil Asset Supply a Scam?

DOASBase
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Oct 24, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 11h old
SummaryAI Copilot

The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional governance, voting, and vesting capabilities.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Owner can pause all transfers
  • A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
  • Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
  • Owner can pause all transfers
  • A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
  • Top-10 concentration > 30% (100.0% total → 48.2% effective; 16.2% in EOAs, 80.0% in contracts; 3.8% burned, locked or in pools excluded)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (11h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Oct 244 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipRetained
MintMintable
Liquidity lockUnknown
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Oct 24, 20262,516 holders
80.0%Contracts16.2%Wallets3.8%
80.0%Contracts16.2%Wallets3.8%
ContractsWalletsBurnedBubble area = share of supply
100.0%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking80.0%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell16.2%
  • Burnedout of circulation3.8%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads48.2%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 24, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Oct 24$74.6K

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensUnknown

Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.

Analysed pool$74.6KShare of depth100.0%

Security Findings

2 Medium5 Info
Medium

Centralized Minting Authority

The owner has the ability to trigger minting via updateMintRate and release functions, which increases the total supply and dilutes existing token holders.CP-01

Issue

The owner has the ability to trigger minting via updateMintRate and release functions, which increases the total supply and dilutes existing token holders.

Fix

Implement a timelock for minting operations or move the minting authority to a decentralized governance contract.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Centralized Transfer Control

The owner can use lockPool and unlockPool to toggle the transferability of tokens, effectively allowing the owner to freeze user assets or restrict market activity.CP-05

Issue

The owner can use lockPool and unlockPool to toggle the transferability of tokens, effectively allowing the owner to freeze user assets or restrict market activity.

Fix

Remove the ability to arbitrarily lock transfers or restrict this functionality to specific, time-bound scenarios with clear community oversight.

Status

Unresolved

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 2,516 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 2,516 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

2,516 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

2,516 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $75K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $209K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $75K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $209K (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $75K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $75K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — less than a day of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 24
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional governance, voting, and vesting capabilities. The protocol relies on a centralized owner to manage minting rates and pool access. While the code follows standard OpenZeppelin patterns, the high degree of administrative control over supply and transferability poses a significant trust requirement for token holders.

Technical8/10Low risk

The contract utilizes well-audited OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20, voting, and permit functionality (7.1 Architecture, 7.2 Code Security). The implementation is clean and follows standard patterns for token minting and vesting (7.8 Operations). However, the reliance on custom logic for pool locking and inflation management introduces potential points of failure if the owner account is compromised (7.3 Access Control).

Governance3/10High risk

The economic model is heavily centralized, with the owner having the authority to mint tokens up to a 2% annual cap (7.4 Economic). Governance is currently limited to the owner, with no decentralized voting mechanism for administrative changes (7.5 Governance). This creates a trust-based environment where holders must rely on the owner's discretion regarding supply dilution and market access (7.4 Economic).

Upgrades4/10Medium risk

The contract is not currently using a proxy pattern, meaning the logic is immutable (7.7 Upgrades). While this prevents malicious logic updates, it also prevents the protocol from patching potential bugs without a migration. The current architecture is stable and predictable for users (7.1 Architecture).

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

To improve security, consider transitioning the ownership to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized DAO structure to mitigate the risks associated with a single point of failure.

Additionally, implementing a timelock on sensitive functions like updateMintRate would provide transparency and allow the community to react to significant changes in token supply. Ensure that all administrative actions are logged via events to maintain an audit trail. For long-term sustainability, consider renouncing ownership or moving to a governance-controlled model once the initial distribution and vesting phases are complete.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeToken
NetworkBase
Token age11h
Contract0xce8a…4698
Deployer0xd5c1…50b3
Badge for your website
Digital Oil Asset Supply security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Oct 24, 202656Medium

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the DOAS contract address?

The Digital Oil Asset Supply (DOAS) contract on Base is 0xce8a6353754b74ca2c1559bda72f5c3f78644698. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.

Is Digital Oil Asset Supply a scam?

Quantum Audit's risk score for Digital Oil Asset Supply is 56/100 (Medium risk) as of Oct 24, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Retained; Mint: Mintable; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.

Who holds DOAS?

As of Oct 24, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 100.0% of the supply across 2,516 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Digital Oil Asset Supply?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page