Quantum Audit Logo

Is Claus a Scam?

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page →

Claus CLAUS
0x1b54…a6b8
Ethereum
Not verifiedThis record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked today 1 audit on record New Launch · 1d old
DexScreener ↗
How is this score calculated? → High Risk
Executive SummaryAI Copilot

This audit covers the BurnableToken proxy and its implementation. The contract functions as an upgradeable ERC-20 token with burn capabilities. The implementation utilizes standard OpenZeppelin libraries, and no critical or high-severity vulnerabilities were identified during the audit.

1 High6 Informational
! Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (1d old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.
Volume 24h
$4.67M
Liquidity
$541.6K
Price
$0.01079
Token Age
1d
Top 10 Holders
19.9%

Security Findings

1 High6 Info
High

Liquidity withdrawable by the owner/deployer

QA-LIQUIDITY0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by the token's owner/deployer (0xbb14…f1c5) — they can pull that liquidity at any moment. This is the rug-pull path. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them. This assessment covers the main pool, which holds 51% of the token's DEX liquidity; the other pools were not assessed.
Issue0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by the token's owner/deployer (0xbb14…f1c5) — they can pull that liquidity at any moment. This is the rug-pull path. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them. This assessment covers the main pool, which holds 51% of the token's DEX liquidity; the other pools were not assessed.
FixCheck the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

No issues identified in the reviewed source

I-01The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint/owner authority, mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.
IssueThe verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint/owner authority, mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.
FixRe-check after any contract upgrade or ownership change, both of which can alter behaviour without changing this page.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Who holds the supply

QA-HOLDERSThe ten largest holders own 19.9% of supply. What remains: 6.6% in wallets, 13.3% in other contracts. 3,193 holders in total.
IssueThe ten largest holders own 19.9% of supply. What remains: 6.6% in wallets, 13.3% in other contracts. 3,193 holders in total.
FixWatch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Not listed by any independent source

QA-IDENTITY3,193 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Issue3,193 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
FixMatch the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

The market for this token

QA-MARKETLiquidity $1.1M (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $10.6M (DexScreener, all pools).
IssueLiquidity $1.1M (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $10.6M (DexScreener, all pools).
FixSize any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Asset class: Project token

QA-PROFILEA token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: a single wallet (EOA). Code: upgradeable proxy. Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $1.1M of DEX liquidity across 26 pools. Launch: 1 days of market history.
IssueA token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: a single wallet (EOA). Code: upgradeable proxy. Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $1.1M of DEX liquidity across 26 pools. Launch: 1 days of market history.
FixCheck the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Recently launched — 1 day of market history

QA-RECENTThe token's oldest DEX pool is 1 day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
IssueThe token's oldest DEX pool is 1 day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
FixRe-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
StatusAcknowledged

Category Ratings

TechnicalMedium6/10

The BurnableToken contract is an upgradeable ERC-20 token with standard burn functionality. It inherits from OpenZeppelin's `ERC20Upgradeable` and `Ownable2StepUpgradeable`, ensuring robust and well-tested implementations (7.2 Code Security). The contract includes an `updateMetadata` function, restricted to the owner, allowing for changes to the token's name, symbol, and URI. No direct owner control over transfer logic or economic parameters was identified (7.3 Access Control).

GovernanceHigh1/10

The contract's economic model is straightforward, functioning as a standard ERC-20 token with burn capabilities. There are no complex economic mechanisms or parameters that can be manipulated by privileged roles (7.4 Economic). Governance is centralized, with an EOA owner controlling metadata updates and ownership transfers. The owner's ability to `updateMetadata` (7.5 Governance) is the primary governance-related function, which is a standard administrative control.

UpgradesHigh1/10

The contract utilizes an EIP-1967 Transparent Proxy pattern, managed by an OpenZeppelin `ProxyAdmin` contract (7.1 Architecture). The `ProxyAdmin` is owned by an EOA, which allows for future upgrades of the `BurnableToken` implementation (7.7 Upgrades). This setup provides flexibility for bug fixes or feature enhancements, though it centralizes upgrade control with the EOA owner. The upgrade mechanism itself is standard and well-understood.

Security Checklist

2/5 checks passed
Contract VerifiedPass
Ownership RenouncedFail
No Mint FunctionPass
Liquidity LockedFail
Not a ProxyFail
HoneypotNoneBuy Tax0.0%Sell Tax0.0%

Proxy Upgrade Controls

Proxy TypeEip1967 Transparent
AdminOZ ProxyAdmin → EOA
ImplementationVerified source
Upgrades (30d)2

Holder Composition

19.9% in top 10
6.6% in wallets13.3% in contracts
Effective Concentration11.9%

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Liquidity Depth

$1.06M across 26 pairs
Uniswap v4ETHanalysed$541.6K51.2%Uniswap v4USDC$313.1K29.6%Uniswap v4ETH$141.9K13.4%Uniswap v4ETH$15.2K1.4%Uniswap v4ETH$12.9K1.2%Uniswap v4USDC$12.0K1.1%
Show 4 more pairsShow less
Uniswap v4USDC$3.0K0.3%Uniswap v4USDC$2.4K0.2%Uniswap v4USDC$2.4K0.2%Uniswap v4USDC$2.4K0.2%

The 16 remaining pairs hold $10.6K between them and are not listed.

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

LP Distribution

Top-1 Unlocked Holder100.0%
Top-3 Unlocked100.0%

Key Addresses

2 addresses
Deployer
0xbb14…f1c5
Unlocked LP Held By
0xbb14…f1c5

A privileged address — the deployer, the owner, or the token contract itself — is among these holders, so that party can withdraw liquidity.

What Raised This Score

3 factors
  • Upgradeable proxy — the admin can replace the logic; admin: ProxyAdmin -> EOA
  • 2 proxy upgrade(s) in the last 30 days
  • Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool; this pool is 51% of DEX liquidity) — withdrawable by the owner/deployer — rug-pull risk

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Related Audits

6 more on the record
TurtleHigh RiskSyrup Token (SYRUP)High RiskMinpentai (PENTA)High RiskPortalHigh RiskNillion (NIL)High RiskSynapse (SYN)High Risk

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Claus?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit