Is CESSToken (CESS) Safe? Smart Contract Security Analysis

Security Findings

1 Med5 Info

Medium

Liquidity not locked

QA-LIQUIDITY0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0xb583…06f0 — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.

Issue0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0xb583…06f0 — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.

FixCheck the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.

StatusAcknowledged

Info

No issues identified in the reviewed source

I-01The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.

IssueThe verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.

FixRe-check after any contract upgrade or ownership change, both of which can alter behaviour without changing this page.

StatusAcknowledged

Info

Who holds the supply

QA-HOLDERSThe ten largest holders own 93.9% of supply. Of that, 3.1% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 89.8% in wallets, 1.0% in other contracts. 55,605 holders in total.

IssueThe ten largest holders own 93.9% of supply. Of that, 3.1% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 89.8% in wallets, 1.0% in other contracts. 55,605 holders in total.

FixWatch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

StatusAcknowledged

Info

Listed, but not independently verified

QA-IDENTITYListed on CoinGecko as CESS Network (CESS), market cap $6M, rank #1652. 55,605 holders.

IssueListed on CoinGecko as CESS Network (CESS), market cap $6M, rank #1652. 55,605 holders.

FixMatch the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

StatusAcknowledged

Info

The market for this token

QA-MARKETLiquidity $850K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $1.1M (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $366K (DexScreener, all pools).

IssueLiquidity $850K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $1.1M (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $366K (DexScreener, all pools).

FixSize any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

StatusAcknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

QA-PROFILEA token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $850K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: 462 days of market history.

IssueA token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $850K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: 462 days of market history.

FixCheck the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

StatusAcknowledged

Category Ratings

TechnicalLow8/10

The CESSToken contract is a robust implementation of the ERC-20 standard, providing essential token functionalities such as `transfer` and `balanceOf` (7.1 Architecture). The absence of any privileged functions that can modify transfer logic or freeze assets significantly enhances its security posture (7.2 Code Security, 7.3 Access Control). This design choice minimizes potential technical attack vectors, ensuring predictable and decentralized token operations.

GovernanceHigh3/10

The contract features a highly decentralized governance model, as no specific roles or addresses possess the ability to control or alter core token parameters (7.5 Governance). This design effectively mitigates risks associated with centralized control, such as arbitrary fund freezes or modifications to token supply. Economic risks are primarily external, related to market dynamics rather than inherent contract vulnerabilities (7.4 Economic), offering a stable on-chain asset.

UpgradesLow8/10

The CESSToken contract is not deployed as a proxy and therefore lacks upgradeability features (7.7 Upgrades). This immutability eliminates all risks associated with upgrade mechanisms, such as malicious proxy implementations or faulty upgrade logic. Users can rely on the contract's consistent behavior throughout its lifecycle, as its code cannot be altered post-deployment.

Security Checklist

3/5 checks passed

Contract VerifiedPass

Ownership Renounced?

No Mint FunctionPass

Liquidity LockedFail

Not a ProxyPass

HoneypotNoneBuy Tax0.0%Sell Tax0.0%

Holder Composition

93.9% in top 10

89.8% in wallets1.0% in contracts

Effective Concentration90.2%

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Liquidity Depth

$850.0K

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

LP Distribution

Top-1 Unlocked Holder100.0%

Top-3 Unlocked100.0%

Key Addresses

3 addresses

Deployer

0x61a1…e2d7

Unlocked LP Held By

0xb583…06f00x31d2…50a1

No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.

What Raised This Score

2 factors

Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool) — held by independent providers — market-depth risk
Top-10 concentration > 70% (93.9% total → 90.2% effective; 89.8% in EOAs, 1.0% in contracts; 3.1% burned, locked or in pools excluded)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Not Signed In

Is CESSToken Safe?

Security Findings

Liquidity not locked

No issues identified in the reviewed source

Who holds the supply

Listed, but not independently verified

The market for this token

Asset class: Project token

Category Ratings

Security Checklist

Holder Composition

Liquidity Depth

LP Distribution

Key Addresses

What Raised This Score

Related Audits

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of CESSToken?